Skip to main content
Log in

The relative efficiency of bimodal presentation as an aid to learning

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Broadbent, D. E. Successive responses to simultaneous stimuli.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1956,8, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulgarella, R. G., & Archer, E. J. Concept identification of auditory stimuli as a function of amount of relevant and irrelevant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,63, 254–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, C. Auditory discrimination and learning: Social factors.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1964,10, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R.Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. New York: John Wiley, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, F. R. Recognition learning under multiple channel presentation and testing conditions.AV Communication Review, 1961,9(1), 24–43. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, F. R. Single and multiple channel communication: A review of research and a proposed model.AV Communication Review, 1961,9(6), 235–262. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haygood, D. H. Audio-visual concept formation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsia, H. J. The information processing capacity of modality and channel performance.AV Communication Review, 1971,19, 51–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, P.A., & Deutsch, M. Modality of stimulus presentation in serial learning for retarded and normal readers.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964,19, 627–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lordahl, D. S. Concept identification using simultaneous auditory and visual signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961,62, 283–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E., & others. Graphic communication and the crisis in education.AV Communication Review, 1957, 5(3), special issue.

  • Mowbray, G. H. Simultaneous visions and audition: The comprehension of prose passages with varying levels of difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1953,46, 365–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowbray, G. H. The perception of short phrases presented simultaneously for visual and auditory reception.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954,6, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B., Jr. Visual and auditory stores in short-term memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,18, 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worchel, P. Space perception and orientation in the blind. In E. P. Trapp & P. Himelstein (Eds.),Readings on the exceptional child. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1962. Pp. 323–349.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Menne, J.M., Menne, J.W. The relative efficiency of bimodal presentation as an aid to learning. AVCR 20, 170–180 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768415

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768415

Keywords

Navigation