Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The origins and development of intrinsic and adaptive programing

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Broudy, H. S. Historical exemplars of teaching method. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J.The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, N. A. Automatic tutoring by intrinsic programming. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.),Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1960. Pp. 286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, N. A. Characteristics of branching programs. In O. M. Haugh (Ed.),The University of Kansas Conference on Programmed Learning, vol. 11, no. 2. Lawrence: University of Kansas Publications, 1961. Pp. 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, N. A. On the differences between linear and intrinsic programing.Phi Delta Kappan, 1963,64, 250–254. (Also in J. P. DeCecco,Educational technology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964. Pp. 142–251.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, E. Historical setting of programmed instruction. In P. C. Lange (Ed.),Programed instruction. Sixty-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967. Pp. 28–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick, M. C. A new approach to computer assisted instruction. Proceedings of the National Conference on the Use of Audio-visuals in Medical Schools. Montgomery, Alabama, University of Alabama, August 7,1969.

  • Holland, J. G. Research on programing variables. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programed learning, II: Data and directions. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1965. Pp. 66–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, H. General introduction to teaching machine procedure. In K. Austwick (Ed.),Teaching machines and programming. New York: Macmillan, 1964. Pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaus, D. J. An analysis of programing techniques. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programed learning, II: Data and directions. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1965. Pp. 118–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, D. R. Who thought of it first? A review of historical references to programmed instruction.Educational Technology, 1969,9, 93–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysaught, J. P., & Williams, C. M.A guide to programmed instruction. New York: Wiley, 1963. Pp. 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F.Preparing objectives for programmed instruction. San Francisco: Fearon, 1961. Republished asPreparing Instructional Objectives, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markle, S. M.Good frames and bad: A grammar of frame writing. New York: Wiley, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellan, I. Teaching and educational inventions. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.),Teaching machines and programed learning: A source book. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1960. Pp. 265–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressey, S. L. A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores- and teaches.School and Society, 1926,23,373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. Programmed instruction today and tomorrow. InFour case studies of programed instruction. New York: Fund for the Advancement of Education, 1964. P. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. The science of learning and the art of teaching.Harvard Educational Review, 1954,24, 86–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. Teaching machines. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.),Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book.Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1960. Pp. 137–158. (Also inScience, 1958,128, 969–977.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolurow, L. M. & Davis, D. Teaching machines and computer-based systems. In R. Glaser (Ed.),Teaching machines and programed learning, II: Data and directions. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, Department of Audiovisual Instruction, 1965. Pp. 163–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L.Education. New York: Macmillan, 1912. Pp. 164–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C.Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Century, 1932. (Republished: Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1951.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttal, W. R. On conversational interaction. In J. E. Coulson (Ed.),Programmed learning and computer-based instruction. New York: Wiley, 1962. Pp. 171–190.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education, Indiana State University, 47809, Terre Haute

    David Alan Gilman (Associate professor of education)

Authors
  1. David Alan Gilman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilman, D.A. The origins and development of intrinsic and adaptive programing. ECTJ 20, 64–76 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768389

Keywords

Search

Navigation