Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Generating meaningful hypotheses with aptitude-treatment interactions

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abramson, T., & Kagen, E. Familiarization of content and different response modes in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, G. H. Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E. Information processing in the nervous system.Science, 1965, 3695, 457–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, P. R. The response in a linear program: Its mode and importance.Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 1967,4 (February), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campeau, P. L. Level of anxiety and presence or absence of feedback in programmed instruction. USOE, NDEA Title VII Project No. 1155. Palo Alto, Calif.: American Institutes for Research, February 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R. A theoretical orientation for instructional film research.A V Communication Review, 1953,1, 38–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. C., Jr., & Gaeth, J. H. Interactions of modality with age and with meaningfulness in verbal learning.Tournai of Educational Psychology, 1967,58, 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1967. Pp. 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. Final Report, USOE Contract No. OEC4-6-061269-1217. Stanford University, 1969.

  • Dale, E.Audio-visual methods in teaching. New York: Dryden, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, B., & Doty, L. A. Programmed instructional effectiveness in relation to certain student characteristics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964, 334–338.

  • Dwyer, F. M. Adapting visual illustrations for effective learning.Harvard Educational Review, 1967,37, 250–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, F. M.A guide for improving visualized instruction. State College, Pa.: Learning Services, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. A theory of pictorial perception.AV Communication Review, 1954,2, 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, N. E. Personal preference for method as a factor in learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962,53, 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, H. R., & Sassenrath, J. M. Relation of achievement motivation and test anxiety to performance in programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1966,57, 14–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lublin, S. C. Reinforcement schedules, scholastic aptitude, autonomy need, and achievement in a programmed course.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. E. (Ed.) Graphic communication and the crisis in Education.AV Communication Review, 1957,5 (3), 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W., Smith, W. I., & Teenan, R.Motivation variables in programed learning, NEM 795, 1965.

  • Morris, C. W.Signs, language, and behavior. New York: Prentice Hall, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, C. E. Individual differences and preference for instructional methods.Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 1973,5, 253–262. Also, Montreal: McGill University, 1971. (ED 059 971.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, C. E., & McKeachie, W. J. Offering course options: Personality, option preference, and course outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, March 1970.

  • Rhetts, J. E. Attribute-treatment interactions and individualized instruction: A conceptual framework and example from the project PLAN. In L. Sperry (Ed.),Learning, performance and individualized differences: Essays and Readings. Glenview, I11.: Scott Foresman, 1972. Pp. 269–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhetts, J. E. Task, learner, and treatment variables.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skanes, G. R., Sullivan, A. M., Rowe, E. J., & Shannon, E. Intelligence and transfer: Aptitude by treatment interactions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 563–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., & Salomon, G. Aptitudes and instructional media.AV Communication Review, 1968,16, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E., Tiffin, J., & Seibert, W. F. Individual differences and instructional film effects.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., & Abramson, T. Interaction among anxiety, stress, response mode and familiarity of subject matter on achievement from programmed instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,62, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers, R. M. W.Man’s information system. Scranton, Pa.: Chandler Publishing, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, R. M. W., McCormick, M. C., Van Mondfrans, A. D., & William, F. E.Research and theory related to audiovisual information transmission. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Bureau of Education Research, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Advanced Instructional System, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Lowry AFB, 80230, Denver, CO

    Perrin E. Parkhust (senior engineering psychologist)

Authors
  1. Perrin E. Parkhust
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Many of the statistical and methodological issues of ATI research, beyond the scope of this paper, are dealt with by other authors in this special AVCR issue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parkhust, P.E. Generating meaningful hypotheses with aptitude-treatment interactions. ECTJ 23, 171–183 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768376

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768376

Keywords

Search

Navigation