Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intellectual abilities and instructional media design

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, D. I. Some effects of advance organizers and level of questions on the learning and retention of written social studies material.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970,61, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H., Cooney, S. M., & Weintraub, R.Audio implementation of still and motion pictures. USOE Final Report, Project No. 5-0741. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Research Division, Department of Cinema, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H., Daehling, W. A., Russell, J. J. IV., & Nielsen, T. G.Effectiveness of different combinations of visual and verbal presentation modes in teaching different kinds of learning tasks. USOE Final Report, Project No. 6-1265. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Research Division, Department of Cinema, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H., Filep, R. F., & Cooney, S. M.Visual and audio presentation of machine-programmed instruction. USOE Final Report, Project No. 5-0724-2-12-1. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Research Division, Department of Cinema, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H., & Weintraub, R.The motion variables in film presentation. USOE Final Report, Project No. 5-1123. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Research Division, Department of Cinema, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. H., Weintraub, R., & Cooney, S. M.Learner response, feedback, and review in film presentation. USOE Final Report, Project No. 5-1177. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Research Division, Department of Cinema, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. Educational psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 1967,18, 103–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P.Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., & Fitzgerald, D. Organizer, general background, and antecedent learning in sequential verbal learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1962,53, 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A. D. Verbal ability and visual verbal codes of presentation in the acquisition of a poetic concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1974.

  • Berliner, D. C., & Cahen, L. S. Trait-treatment interaction in learning. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.),Review of research in education: 1. Itasca, Ill.:F. E. Peacock, 1973. Pp. 58–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, G. H. Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 627–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. Effects of logical and scrambled sequences in mathematical materials on learning with programmed instruction materials.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970,61, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R. (Program Director).Instructional film research reports. Vol. 1, NAVEXOS P-1220 (Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-36). Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: U.S. Navy, Special Devices Center, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. R., & Greenhill, L. P. (Program Directors).Instructional film research reports. Vol. 2, NAVEXOS P-1543 (Technical Report No. SDC 269-7-61). Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: U.S. Navy, Special Devices Center, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington, in press.

  • Di Vesta, F. J. Theory and measures of individual differences in studies of trait by treatment interaction.Educational Psychologist, 1973,13(1), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, W. W., Jr. Learning in multi-media programed instruction as a function of aptitude and instruction rate controlled by compressed speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1970.

  • Frase, L. T. Boundary conditions for mathemagenic behaviors.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, W. C., Blount, N. S., & Johnson, S. L. A comparison of verbal statement, symbolic notation, and figurai representation of grammar concepts. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin, Center for Cognitive Learning, 1968.

  • Gagné, R. M. (Ed.).Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M.The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. Learning and instructional sequence. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.),Review of research in education: I. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock, 1973. Pp. 4–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Gropper, G. L.Individual differences in learning from visual and verbal presentations. Pittsburgh, Pa.: American Institutes for Research, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Rohwer, W. D., Jr. Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 1969,20, 381–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (Ed.).Morion picture testing and research. Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Report No. 7. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. Individuals and learning: The new aptitudes.Educational Research, 1972,1(6), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, G. L., & Kress, G. C., Jr. Individualizing instruction through pacing procedures.AV Communication Review, 1965,13, 165–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropper, G. L., & Lumsdaine, A. A.An ’experimental comparison of a conventional TV lesson with a programmed TV lesson requiring active student response. Studies in Televised Instruction Report No. 2. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Metropolitan Pittsburgh Educational Television Stations WQED-WQEX and American Institute for Research, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, N. R.Increasing long-term retention of knowledge: Effects on learning and retention for students of different ability level. USOE Final Report Project No. 7-48-7670-204. Palo Alto, Cal.: American Institute for Research, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D.Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. H., & McClure, A. H. Varied versus identical repetition in filmed instruction on micrometer reading. Abstracted in A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1961. Pp. 510–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanner, J. H., & Rosenstein, A. J. Television in army training: Color vs. black and white.AV Communication Review, 1960,8, 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koran, M. L., Snow, R. E., & McDonald, F. J. Teacher aptitude and observational learning of a teaching skill.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,62, 219–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, R. P., Nelson, W. H., & King, F. J. Identification and definition of subject-matter content variables related to human aptitudes. USOE Cooperative Research Project No. 2914. Tallahassee: Florida State University, 1967. (Unpublished)

  • Lee, W. Supra-paragraph prose structure: Its specification, perception, and effects on learning.Psychological Reports, 1965,17, 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. (Ed.).Student response in programmed instruction. Publication 943. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1961. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. Some conclusions concerning student response and a science of instruction. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1961. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. Instruments and media of instruction. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963. Pp. 583–682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsdaine, A. A. Sulzer, R. L., & Kopstein, F. F. The effects of animation cues and repetition of examples on learning from an instructional film. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1961. Pp. 241–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. A.Enhancements and simplifications of motivational and stimulus variables in audiovisual instructional materials (a working paper). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael D. N., & Maccoby, N. Factors influencing the effects of student participation on verbal learning from films: Motivating versus practice effects, “feedback,” and overt versus covert responding. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1961. Pp. 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedermeyer, F., Brown, J., & Sulzen, B. Learning and varying sequences of ninth-grade mathematics materials.Journal of Experimental Education, 1969,37, 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop, D. S.Effects on learning of the prominence of organizational outlines in instructional films. Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University, Human Engineering Report SDC 269-7-33. Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: U.S. Navy Special Devices Center, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radlow, R.The relation of some measures of ability to measures of learning from sound motion pictures. Instructional Film Research Program, Pennsylvania State University, Technical Report SPECDEVCEN 269-7-58. Port Washington, L.I., N.Y.: U.S. Navy Training Devices Center, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roshal, S. M. Film-mediated learning with varying representation of the task: Viewing angle, portrayal of demonstration, motion, and student participation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 1961. Pp. 155–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, E. Z. The concept of mathemagenic activities.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. What does it do to Johnny? A cognitive functionalistic view of research on media. In G. Salomon & R. E. Snow (Eds.),Viewpoints (Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University), 1970,46, 33–62.

  • Salomon, G. Can we affect cognitive skills through visual media? An hypothesis and initial findings.AV Communication Review, 1972,20, 401–422. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude-treatment interaction hypotheses.Review of Educational Research, 1972,42, 327–343. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J., Berliner, D. C., Bravitch, M. M., & Loading, D. The effects of position and type of question on learning from prose: The interaction of treatments with individual differences in learners. Research and development memorandum No. 98, Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, Stanford University, School of Education, 1972.

  • Snow, R. E. Research on media and aptitudes. In G. Salomon & R. E. Snow (Eds.),Viewpoints (Bulletin of the School of Education, Indiana University), 1970,46, 63–89.

  • Snow, R. E., & Salomon, G. Aptitudes and instructional media.AV Communication Review, 1968,16, 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S. Review of the response mode issue.Review of Educational Research, 1973,43, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Organized retention and cued recall. In H. J. Klausmeier & G. T. O’Hearn (Eds.),Research and development toward the improvement of education. Madison, Wis.: Dembar Educational Research Services, 1968. Pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, W. Perception of visual displays. In M. L. Fleming (Ed.), Aspects of perception—their relation to instructional communications. Indiana University, School of Education:Viewpoints, 1971,47,112-140.

  • Zeaman, D., & House, B. J. The relation of IQ and learning. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Learning and individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1967. Pp. 192–212.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Instructional Technology at the University of Southern California, USA

    William H. Allen (professor of education and chairman)

Authors
  1. William H. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen, W.H. Intellectual abilities and instructional media design. ECTJ 23, 139–170 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768375

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768375

Keywords

Search

Navigation