Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Task analysis and part versus whole learning methods

  • Articles
  • Published:
AV communication review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, R. C., & Faust, G. W.Educational psychology. New York: Dodd Mead, in press.

  • Birnbaum, I. M. Free-recall learning as a function of prior-list organization.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968,7, 1037–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, I. M. Prior-list organization in part-whole free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 836–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. H. Transfer effects of word and letter training in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1964,3, 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, W. A. The occurrence of clustering in the recall of randomly organized associates.Journal of General Psychology, 1953,49, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. H., & Lesgold, A. M. Organizations as a determinant of part-to-whole transfer in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 501–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, G. E., & Naylor, J. C. The relative efficiency of several training methods as a function of transfer task complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 505–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. Whole and part methods in learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1924,15, 229–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. W. Factors in whole and part learning a visually perceived maze.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1936,49, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. W. Whole versus part learning the spider maze.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1937,20, 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. W. Whole and four part learning 32 unit spider mazes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1938,22, 439–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. W., Morrison, S. H., & Stacy, C. L. Whole and part learning a visually perceived maze.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1935,47, 218–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, L. W. Whole and part methods with non-serial reactions.American Journal of Psychology, 1929,41, 543–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, L. W. Whole and part methods with unrelated reactions.American Journal of Psychology, 1930,42, 591–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts, L. W. Whole and part methods with visual and spatial material.American Journal of Psychology, 1932,44, 526–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. J., & Meines, M. Factors determining the relative efficiency of the whole and part method of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1932,15, 717–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deese, J. On the structure of associative meaning.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H.Psychology: An elementary textbook. Boston: Heath, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, H.Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. (Transi. by H. A. Ruger.) New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eustace, B. W. Learning a complex concept at different hierarchical levels.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1969,60, 449–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M. The acquisition of knowledge.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 335–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M.The conditions of learning. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Bassler, O. C. Study of retention of some topics of elementary non-metric geometry.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963,54, 123–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, W. R., & Whitman, J. R. Form and amount of internal structure as factors in free-recall of nonsense words.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1965,4, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katona, G.Organizing and memorizing. New York: Columbia University Press, 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakenan, M. E. The whole and part methods of memorizing poetry and prose.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1913,4, 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, G. O. Whole-part problem.Psychological Bulletin, 1931,28, 713–739. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, G. O. The intelligence quotient as a factor in the wholepart problem.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1931,14, 333–358. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch, J. A., & Irion, A. L.The psychology of human learning. New York: McKay, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, N., Michael, D. N., & Levine, S. Further studies of student participation procedures in film instruction: Review and preview convert practice, and motivational interactions. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C. : National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Verbal learning. InNew directions in psychology, III. New York: Academic Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. Organization and memory. In K. W. Spence & J. R. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolius, G. J., & Sheffield, F. D. Optimum methods of combining practice with filmed demonstrations in teaching complex response sequences: Serial learning of a mechanical-assembly task. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, A. W. (Ed.)Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, M. D. Correction and review on successive parts in learning a hierarchical task.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965,56, 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, D. N., & Maccoby, N. Factors influencing the effects of student participation on verbal learning from films: Motivating versus practice effects, “feedback”, and overt versus covert responding. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. R. Extraexperimental transfer in serial recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 494–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A. The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 1956,63, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, J. C., & Briggs, G. E. Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,65, 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novinski, L. Part-whole and whole-part free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 152–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbison, W. D. The relative efficiency of whole and part methods of learning paired associates as a function of length of list. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, 1944.

  • Pechstein, L. A. Alleged elements of waste in learning a motor problem by the “part” method.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1917,8, 303–310. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechstein, L. A. Whole vs. part methods of learning: A comparative study.Psychological Monographs, 1917,23, No. 99. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechstein, L. A. Whole versus part methods in learning nonsense syllables.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1918,9, 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechstein, L. A. The whole vs. part methods in learning: Comparison and summary.Student Education (Yearbook of the National Society of College Teachers and Educators), 1926,15, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., & Goggin, J. Whole versus part learning of serial lists as a function of meaningfulness and intralist similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,68, 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L., & Goggin, J. Whole versus part learning of paired associate lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966,71, 867–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, W. H., & Snyder, J. C. The most economical unit for committing to memory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1911,2, 133–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, H. B. A repetition of Ebert and Meumann’s practice experiment on memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1917,2, 315–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, H. B. Part and whole methods of learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1924,15, 107–115. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, H. B. Part and whole methods of learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1924,15, 389–493. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawdon, E. W. Should children learn poems in “wholes” or in “parts”?Forum Education, 1927,5, 182–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seagoe, M. V. Qualitative wholes: A re-evaluation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1936,27, 537–545. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagoe, M. V. Qualitative wholes: Classroom experiments.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1936,27, 612–620. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagoe, M. V. Additional laboratory experiments with qualitative wholes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1937,20, 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, F. D. Theoretical considerations in the learning of complex sequential tasks from demonstration and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.),Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, D. C.: National Academy of Science—National Research Council, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Subjective organization of a free recall of “unrelated” words.Psychological Review, 1962,69, 344–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Subjective organization and effects of repetition in multitrial free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966,5, 193–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. Theoretical issues in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B. J. Laboratory studies of verbal learning. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed.),Theories of learning and instruction. Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1964. Pp. 133–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, W. B., & Schwartz, M. Measurement characteristics of recall in relation to the presentation of increasingly large amounts of material.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959,50, 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingartner, H. Associative structure and serial learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 476–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, R. H., & Perkins, F. T.Principles of mental development. New York: Thomas Y. Cromwell Company, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, W. H. Should poems be learnt by school children as “wholes” or in “part.”British Journal of Psychology, 1924,15, 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. W., & Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana

    Donald J. Cunningham (assistant professor of educational psychology)

Authors
  1. Donald J. Cunningham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, D.J. Task analysis and part versus whole learning methods. ECTJ 19, 365–398 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768364

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02768364

Keywords

Search

Navigation