Skip to main content
Log in

Transportation energy demand: Model development and use

  • Published:
Nonrenewable Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes work undertaken and sponsored by the Energy Commission to improve transportation energy demand forecasting and policy analysis for California. Two different, but related, modeling systems are presented: the Vehicle Transactions Simulator and the Activity and Mobility Simulator. In addition, the paper discusses some of the important energy issues and analysis that will be addressed in the next few years with the help of these models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brownstone, D., Bunch, D. S., Golob, T. F. and Ren, W., 1996. A personal vehicle transactions choice model for use in forecasting demand for future alternative-fuel vehicles: Research in Transportation Economics, v. 4, p. 87–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunch, D. S., Bradley, M., Golob, T. F., Kitamura, R., and Occhiuzzo, G. P., 1993, Demand for clean-fuel personal vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference study: Transportation Research Ser A, v. 27A (3), p. 237–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Energy Commission, 1994, 1993–1994 California Transportation Energy Analysis Report: Publication No. P300-94-002, Sacramento, California.

  • Golob, T. F., Bunch, D. S., and Brownstone, David, 1997, A vehicle use forecasting model based on revealed and stated vehicle type choice and utilisation data: Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, v. 31, no. 1, p. 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I., and Heggie, I. G., 1983, Understanding travel behaviour, Aldershot, Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavalec, C., 1996, CALCARS: The California conventional and alternative fuel response simulator—A vehicle demand/choice model for California: Staff Report Number P500-96-003, Sacramento, California Energy Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitamura, R., Lula, C. V. and Pas, E. I., 1993, AMOS: An activity-based, flexible, and truly behavioral tool for evaluation of TDM measures:in Proceedings of the 21st Summer Annual Meeting. Transportation Planning Methods, p. 283–294.

  • Train, K., 1986. Qualitative choice analysis: Theory, econometrics, and an application to automobile demand, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Kavalec.

Additional information

This paper was prepared as the result of work at the California Energy Commission. It does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees, or the State of California.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kavalec, C. Transportation energy demand: Model development and use. Nat Resour Res 7, 123–127 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767705

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767705

Key Words

Navigation