Abstract
Over the past decade, the Audiovisual Assessment Group of the Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario has evaluated nearly 500 drug education films. A review of those evaluations reveals that good drug education films meet certain criteria and that, although there are many good films, there are many gaps that film producers could fill.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hirschorn, P. H., & Goodstadt, M. S.Readership evaluation of “Projection,” ARF’s Audio-visual Review (Substudy 620). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1974.
Sheppard, M. A.A review of the Ontario Addiction Research Foundation Audiovisual Assessment Group (Substudy 1078). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1979.
Sheppard, M. A., Cafiso, J. S., & Goodstadt, M. S.A comparison of drug education film ratings by elementary school students and the ARF Audiovisual Assessment Group (Substudy 1074). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1979.
Sheppard, M. A., Chan, G. C., & Goodstadt, M. S.The marketing of drug education film reviews (“Projection”) in Ontario schools (Substudy 1059). Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1979.
Sheppard, M. A., & Goodstadt, M. S. Films and drug education.Journal of Drug Education, 1979, 9(4).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheppard, M.A., Goodstadt, M.S. From Scare Tactics to Reasoned Decisions: A Decade of Drug Education Films. ECTJ 30, 91–96 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767425
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767425