Skip to main content
Log in

Toward Integration: Education, Instructional Technology, and Semiotics

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It has been asserted that the boundaries of instructional technology are unclear; so, too, this author claims, are the strategies that might make them clear. He believes the boundaries can be defined when the superstructure of which the boundaries are a part is identified. In this article he advances a theoretical perspective for analyzing education and instructional technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Buchler, J. (Ed.).Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.An essay on man. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 1957,12, 671–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.Languages of art. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshore, C, & Weiss, P. (Eds.).Collected papers (8 vols.). Cambridge: Belknap Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidt, E. U. Media and learner operations: The problem of a media taxonomy revisited.British Journal of Educational Technology, 1977,8,11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, R.Technology and the management of instruction (Monograph 4). Washington, D.C.: Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoban, C. F. Educational technology and human values.AV Communication Review, 1977, 25, 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, E. Structuralism in social anthropology. In D. Robey (Ed.),Structuralism: An introduction. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W.Foundations of the theory of signs (Vol. 1, No. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W.Signs, language and behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. W.Signification and significance; A study of the relations of signs and values. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neihardt, J. B.Black Elk speaks. New York: Pocket Books, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. Introduction. In D. R. Olson (Ed.),Media and symbols: The forms of expression, communication, and education (Part 1). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. Learning through experience and learning through media. In D. R. Olson (Ed.),Media and symbols: The forms of expression, communication, and education (Part1). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.The social system. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.Essays in sociological theory (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, R.Mental imagery in the child. New York: Basic Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L.Pygmalion in the classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G.Interaction of media, cognition and learning. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saracho, O. N., & Dayton, CM. Relationship of teachers’ cognitive styles to pupils’ academic achievement gains.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 544–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. L.Big media, little media: Tools and technologies for instruction. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A. Semiotics: A survey of the state of the art. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.),Contributions to the doctrine of signs. Bloomington: Indiana University, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, T. A.The sign and its masters. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shands, H. C., & Meltzer, J. D. Unexpected semiotic implications of medical inquiry. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.),A perfusion of signs. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, E.Logical and conceptual analytic techniques for educational researchers. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. Operationism and logical positivism. In M. H. Marx & F. E. Goodson (Eds.),Theories in contemporary psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, A. A., & Wolfe, B. L. Which school resources help learning? Efficiency and equality in Philadelphia public schools.Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review, February 1975, 4.

  • Wallis, M.Arts and signs (Indiana University Publications, Studies in Semiotics, Vol 2). Bloomington: Indiana University, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zifferblatt, S. M. Architecture and human behavior: Towards increased understanding of a functional relationship.Educational Technology, 1972, 12, 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The manuscript was completed while he was assistant professor, Center for Library and Audiovisual Education, St. Cloud State University, St. Cloud, MN 56301.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cassidy, M.F. Toward Integration: Education, Instructional Technology, and Semiotics. ECTJ 30, 75–89 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767424

Keywords

Navigation