References
Carter, Launor. “The Relative Effectiveness of Presenting Numerical Data by the Use of Tables and Graphs.”Headquarters Air Materiel Command, Engineering Division, Memorandum Report Number TSEAA 694–1. April 17, 1946.
Croxton, Frederick. “Some Additional Data.”The American Statistical Association Journal 22:31–36; 1927. (Supplements Eells’ report)
Croxton, Frederick, andStein, Harold. “Graphic Comparison of Bars.”The American Statistical Association Journal 2:54–60; 1932.
Eells, W. C. “Relative Merit of Circles and Bars for Representing Component Parts.”The American Statistical Association Journal 21:119–32; 1926.
Graham, James. “Illusory Trends in the Observation of Bar Graphs.”The Journal of Experimental Psychology 20:597–608; 1937.
Peterson, Lewis, andSchramm, Wilbur. “How Accurately Are Different Kinds of Graphs Read?”Audio-Visual Communication Review 2:178–89; Summer 1954.
Strickland, R. G. A Study of the Possibilities of Graphs as a Means of Instruction in the First Four Grades of the Elementary School. New York: Columbia University Bureau of Publications, 1938.
Wesman, Alexander G.;Seashore, Harold G. ; andBennett, George K. A Manual for the Differential Aptitude Tests. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1952.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was made to determine how much certain factors of graph design contribute to ease of graph comprehension, and was undertaken as an M.S. degree project by Mr. Culbertson.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Culbertson, H.M., Powers, R.D. A study of graph comprehension difficulties. AVCR 7, 97–110 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767016
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02767016