Sex Roles

, Volume 36, Issue 3–4, pp 259–268 | Cite as

Effects of a sexual assault peer education program on men’s belief in rape myths

  • John D. Foubert
  • Kenneth A. Marriott


An all-male sexual assault peer education program focusing on how to help a survivor led to a decrease in rape myth belief among predominantly Caucasian participants immediately after and two months following a one hour program. Program participants believed fewer rape myths than the initial testing of a control group. In addition, a clear majority of participants reported a decreased likelihood of being sexually coercive as a result of attending the program. A new method of decreasing men’s rape myth acceptance by learning how to help a survivor is supported.


  1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkowitz, A. D. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research.Journal of American College Health, 40, 175–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkowitz, A. D. (1994).Men and rape: Theory, research, and prevention programs in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Breire, J., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Self-reported likelihood of sexually aggressive behavior: Attitudinal versus sexual explanations.Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Earle, J. P. (1996). Acquaintance rape workshops: Their effectiveness in changing the attitudes of first year college men.NASPA Journal, 34, 2–18.Google Scholar
  7. Fonow, M. M., Richardson, L., & Wemmerus, V. A. (1992). Feminist rape education: Does it work?Gender and Society, 6, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foubert, J. D., & Marriott, K. A. (1996). Overcoming men’s defensiveness toward sexual assault programs: Learning to help survivors.Journal of College Student Development, 37, 470–472.Google Scholar
  9. Garrett-Gooding, J., & Senter, R. (1987). Attitudes and acts of sexual aggression on a university campus.Sociological Inquiry, 59, 348–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grube, J. W., Mayton, D. M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1994). Inducing change in values, attitudes, and behaviors: Belief system theory and the method of value self-confrontation.Journal of Social Issues, 50, 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamilton, M., & Yee, J. (1990). Rape knowledge and propensity to rape.Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heppner, M. J., Good, G. E., Hillenbrand-Gunn, T. L., Hawkins, A. K., Hacquard, L. L., Nichols, R. K., DeBord, K. A., & Brock, K. J. (1995). Examining sex differences in altering attitudes about rape: A test of the elaboration likelihood model.Journal of Counseling and Development, 73, 640–647.Google Scholar
  13. Heppner, M. J., Humphrey, C. F., Hillenbrand-Gunn, T. L. & DeBord, K. A. (1995). The differential effects of rape prevention programming on attitudes, behavior, and knowledge.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 508–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koss, M. (1992). Rape on campus: Facts and measures.Planning for Higher Education, 20, 21–28.Google Scholar
  15. Koss, M. P., & Oros, C. J. (1982). Sexual experiences survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 455–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee, L. A. (1987). Rape prevention: Experiential training for men.Journal of Counseling and Development, 66, 100–101.Google Scholar
  17. Lenihan, G. O., & Rawlins, M. E. (1994). Rape supportive attitudes among Greek students before and after a date rape prevention program.Journal of College Student Development, 35, 450–455.Google Scholar
  18. Lonsway, K. A. (1996). Prevention acquaintance rape through education: What do we know?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 229–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maguire, K., & Pastore, A. L. (1995).Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  20. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males.Journal of Social Issues, 37, 138–157.Google Scholar
  21. Martin, P. Y., & Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus.Gender and Society, 3, 457–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Sullivan, C. (1991). Acquaintance gang rape on campus. In A. Parrot, & L. Bechhofer (Eds.),Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, S. A., & Franzese, B. (1987). Correlates of college men’s sexual abuse of women.Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 223–228.Google Scholar
  24. Ring, T. E., & Kilmartin, C. (1992). Man to man about rape: A rape prevention program for men.Journal of College Student Development, 33, 82–84.Google Scholar
  25. Sandberg, G., Jackson, T. L., & Petric-Jackson, P. (1987). College students’ attitudes regarding sexual coercion and aggression: Developing educational and preventive strategies.Journal of College Student Personnel, 28, 302–311.Google Scholar
  26. Schaffer, A. M., & Nelson, E. S. (1993). Rape-supportive attitudes: Effects of on campus residence and education.Journal of College Student Development, 34, 175–179.Google Scholar
  27. Schewe, P., & O’Donohue, W. (1993). Rape prevention: Methodological problems and new directions.Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Szymanski, L. A., Devlin, A. S., Chrisler, J. C., & Vyse, S. A. (1993). Gender role and attitudes toward rape in male and female college students.Sex Roles, 29, 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. Foubert
    • 1
  • Kenneth A. Marriott
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Resident LifeUniversity of Maryland, College ParkCollege Park
  2. 2.Johns Hopkins UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations