Skip to main content
Log in

Competition from large males and the alternative mating tactics of small males of dawson’s burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (apidae, apinae, anthophorini)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Males of Dawson’s burrowing bees (Amegilla dawsoni) search for virgin females at three locations: (1) open clay patches where females are emerging from underground brood cells, (2) the vegetated peripheral zone adjacent to emergence areas (through which females pass after emerging), and (3) clusters of flowering plants, which are often some distance from emergence areas. Males of Dawson’s burrowing bees exhibit a size dimorphism with large major and small minors. Major males patrol only the open emergence sites, whereas minor males may be found in all three locations. Although most females are mounted and presumably mated immediately upon emergence, some are not, and these females make up a pool of potential mates for the small males patrolling the peripheral zone and flower patches. The density of males at emergence sites and the probability of male-male aggression change over the course of a day and over the entire flight season. When the level of competition is low, some minor males hunt for mates at emergence areas, where potential mates are relatively numerous. But when the presence of many large rivals makes it unlikely that a small male can avoid being displaced from emerging females, minors make the best of a bad job by shifting to areas where majors are absent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J. (1996a). The relation between male body size, fighting, and mating success in Dawson’s burrowing bee,Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Apinae, Anthophorini).J. Zool. 239: 663–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (1996b). Provisional rejection of three alternative hypotheses on the maintenance of a size dichotomy in males of Dawson’s burrowing bee,Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Anthophorini).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 39: 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock, J. (1996c). Small males emerge earlier than large males in Dawson’s burrowing bees (Amegilla dawsoni) (Hymenoptera: Anthophorini).J. Zool. (in press).

  • Alcock, J., Jones, C. E. and Buchmann, S. L. (1977). Male mating strategies in the beeCentris pallida Fox (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Am. Nat. 111: 145–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. (1994).Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthell, J. F., and Daly, H. V. (1995). Male size variation and mating site fidelity in a population ofHabropoda depressa Fowler (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Pan-Pac. Entomol. 71: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia, G. (1980). Sexual competition inScatophaga stercoraria: Size- and density-related changes in male ability to capture females.Behaviour 75: 185–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crespi, B. J. (1986). Size assessment and alternative fighting tactics inElaphrothrips tuberculatus (Insecta: Thysanoptera).Anim. Behav. 34: 1324–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danforth, B. N. (1991). The morphology and behavior of dimorphic males inPerdita portalis (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 29: 235–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1980). Good strategy or evolutionarily stable strategy? In Barlow, G. W., and Silverberg, S. (eds.),Sociobiology: Beyond Nature/Nurture? Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp. 331–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominey, W. J. (1984). Alternative mating tactics and evolutionary stable strategies.Am. Zool. 24: 384–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1982). Beetle horn dimorphism: making the best of a bad lot.Am. Nat. 119: 420–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, S. K. (1987). The mating system and alternative reproductive behaviors ofDendrobias mandibularis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 20: 111–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. R. (1996). Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within the sexes.Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston, T. F. (1991). Ecology and behaviour of the beeAmegilla (Asaropoda) dawsoni (Rayment) with notes on a related species (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae).Rec. West. Aus. Mus. 15: 591–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, F. E., and Tengo, J. (1989). The effects of temperature and body size on the mating pattern of a gregariously nesting bee,Colletes cunicularius (Hymenoptera: Colletidae).Ecol. Entomol. 14: 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, M. L. (1976). Warming rates as a function of body size in periodic endotherms.J. Comp. Physiol. 111: 55–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, K. M., and Evans, H. E. (1983). Alternative mating tactics inBembicinus quinquespinosus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae): Correlation with size and color variation.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, K. M., Evans, H. E., and O’Neill, R. P. (1989). Phenotypic correlates of mating success in the sand waspBembicinus quinquespinosus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae).Can. J. Zool. 67: 2557–2568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1970). The reproductive behaviour and the nature of sexual selection inScatophaga stercoraria L. IV. Epigamic recognition and competition between males for the possession of females.Behaviour 37: 113–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. L. (1994). The influence of horn and body size on the reproductive behavior of the horned rainbow scarab beetlePhanaeus difformis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).J. Insect Behav. 7: 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigurjónsdóttir, H., and Snorrason, S. S. (1995). Distribution of male yellow dungflies around oviposition sites: the effect of body size.Ecol. Entomol. 20: 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. N., and Willmer, P. G. (1989). Warm-up rates and body temperatures in bees: The importance of body size, thermal regime and phylogeny.J. Exp. Biol. 147: 303–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, G. N., Loder, P. M. J., and Blackburn, T. M. (1995). Foraging and courtship behavior in males of the solitary beeAnthophora plumipes (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae): Thermal physiology and the role of body size.Ecol. Entomol. 20: 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stubblefield, J. W., and Seger, J. (1994). Sexual dimorphism in the Hymenoptera. In Short, R. V., and Balaban, E. (eds),The Differences between the Sexes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 71–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1981).Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: Systems for understanding resource-defence polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 355–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. (1983).The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. I. (1983). The effects of size on the mating behaviour of the dung flySepsis cynipsea.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution.Proc. Philos. Soc. Am. 123: 222–2234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alcock, J. Competition from large males and the alternative mating tactics of small males of dawson’s burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (apidae, apinae, anthophorini). J Insect Behav 10, 99–113 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765477

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765477

Key words

Navigation