ECTJ

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 185–190 | Cite as

Effect of pictures on children’s comprehension of written text

  • Marilyn J. Haring
  • Maurine A. Fry
Article
  • 148 Downloads

Abstract

Studies have shown that under certain conditions pictures can facilitate young children’s oral prose comprehension. Can pictures also aid comprehension when the information is presented in written form rather than orally? If so, what kinds of pictures, under what conditions? These experimenters analyzed a prose passage into 350 idea units, then interspersed throughout the text pictures depicting either the 179 main ideas or both the main ideas and the 171 nonessential details, or included no pictures. The subjects, fourth and sixth graders, wrote down all they could remember of the story immediately and again 5 days later. Pictures did facilitate both immediate and delayed recall, but only of the main ideas.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aesop. [Aesop’s fables] (V. S. Vemon-Jones, Ed. and trans.). New York: Franklin Watts, Inc., 1967. (Originally published, 1912.)Google Scholar
  2. Cole, J. N. The effects of non-prose textual characteristics on retention of major concepts and supporting details with and without specific instruction in their use. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.),Reading: Theory, research, and practice (26th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference). Clemson, S.C.: National Reading Conference, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  3. Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. A formula for predicting readability: Instructions.Educational Research Bulletin, 1948,27, 37–54.Google Scholar
  4. Dirks, J., & Neisser, U. Memory for objects in real scenes: The development of recognition and recall.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977,23, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Flavell, J. Developmental studies of mediated memory. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsett (Eds.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  6. Koenke, K., & Otto, W. Contribution of pictures to children’s comprehension of the main idea in reading.Psychology in the Schools, 1969,6, 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Levin, J. R., & Lesgold, A. M. On pictures in prose.Educational Communication and Technology, 1978,26, 233–243.Google Scholar
  8. Meyer, B. J. F. Identification of the structure of prose and its implications for the study of reading and memory.Journal of Reading Behavior, 1975,7, 7–47. (a)Google Scholar
  9. Meyer, B. J. F.The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975. (b)Google Scholar
  10. Meyer, B. J. F. The structure of prose: Effects on learning and memory and implication for educational practice. In R. C. Anderson, R. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.Google Scholar
  11. Peeck, J. Retention of pictorial and verbal content of a text with illustrations.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 880–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rohwer, W. D., & Harris, W. J. Media effects on prose learning in two populations of children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67, 651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Samuels, S. J. Effects of pictures on learning to read, comprehension, and attitudes.Review of Educational Research, 1970,40, 397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sticht, T. G., Beck, L. J., Hauke, R. N., Kleinman, G. M., & James, J. H.Auding and reading: A developmental model. Alexandria, Va.: Human Resources Research Organization, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilyn J. Haring
    • 1
  • Maurine A. Fry
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyArizona State UniversityTempe

Personalised recommendations