The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae)
We used a video imaging technique to test the effects of prey movement on attack behavior and foraging patch residence time decision rules of wolf spiders. TwelveSchizocosa ocreata (Hentz) (Lycosidae) were tested in an artificial foraging patch stimulus chamber consisting of a microscreen television displaying a computer digitized, animated image of a cricket. Four prey movement treatments were used: (1) a blank screen, (2) a stationary cricket control, (3) a cricket moving for 1 min, and (4) a cricket moving for 10 min. Spiders stayed significantly longer in treatments with higher cricket activity. Spiders also stayed longer when they attacked the stimulus than when they did not. The distribution of patch residence times of spiders indicates a decision rule based on a fixed probability of leaving.
Key wordsLycosidae decision rules prey movement prey attack wolf spiders
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bell, W. J. (1991).Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources, Champman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
- Ford, M. J. (1978). Locomotory activity and the predation strategy of the wolf-spiderPardosa amentata (Clerck) (Lycosidae).Anim. Behav. 35: 453–461.Google Scholar
- Giulio, L. (1979). Optomotor responses of the jumping spiderHeliophanus muscorum Walck. (Araneae Salticidae) elicited by turning spiral.Monitore Zool. Ital. (N.S.) 13: 143–157.Google Scholar
- Heinrich, B. (1983). Do bumblebees forage optimally, and does it matter?Am. Zool. 23: 273–281.Google Scholar
- Persons, M. H., and Uetz, G. W. (1996b). Wolf spiders vary patch residence time in the presence of chemical cues from prey (Araneae: Lycosidae).J. Arachnol 24: 76–79.Google Scholar
- Persons, M. H., and Uetz, G. W. (1997). Residence time decisions in wolf spiders: is perceiving prey as important as eating prey?Ecoscience 4: 1–5.Google Scholar
- Riechert, S. E. (1985). Decisions in multiple goal contexts: Habitat selection of the spider,Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch).Z. Tierpsychol. 70: 53–69.Google Scholar
- Rovner, J. S. (1991). Evidence for idiothetically controlled turns and extraocular photoreception in lycosid spiders.J. Arachnol. 19: 169–173.Google Scholar
- Rovner, J. S. (1993). Visually mediated responses in the lycosid spiderRabidosa rabida: The roles of different pairs of eyes.Mem. Queensland Mus. 33: 635–638.Google Scholar
- Stephens, D. W., and Krebs, J. R. (1986).Foraging Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
- Wise, D. H. (1993).Spiders in Ecological Webs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Zar, J. H. (1984).Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar