Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of narrator gender on conceptual learning

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Audiovisual materials for nursing students typically show a female nurse demon-strating activities as they are described (and sometimes directed) by a male narrator. Of obvious concern is the effect of such sex stereotyping on female students. Further, do students (male and female) learn as well from instructional video-tapes narrated by an equally competent female narrator? The investigator sought to control all variables but gender of narrator in this study of conceptual learning from videotapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caffrey, J. Auding ability at the secondary level.Education, 1955,75, 303–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. D.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantril, H., & Allport, G.The psychology of radio. New York: Harper & Bros., 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. L. Media, mental imagery, and memory.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M. L. The picture in your mind.AV Communication Review, 1977,25, 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, J. M., & Cameron, P. C. Change in speaker’s voice and release from proactive inhibition,journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 863–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R. E., & Bellezza, F. S. Incidential retention of speaker’s voice.Memory and Cognition, 1977,5, 668–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R., & Glenny, J. Effects of imagining speaker’s voices on the retention of words presented visually.Memory and Cognition, 1977,5, 499–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Globig, L. J., & Touhey, J. C. Sex and affective determinates of lecture content retention.Psychological Reports, 1971,29, 538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldhaber, G. M., & Weaver, C. H. Listener comprehension of compressed speech when the difficulty, rate of presentation, and sex of the listener are varied.Speech Monographs, 1968,35, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, C. E. Evaluating a training program in listening for college freshmen.School Review, 1953,61, 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, W. H. A prospectus for instructional research on visual literacy.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 1978,26, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, L. L., Stansbury, C., Rulin, C., & Linde, S. Memory for modality of presentation: Within-modality discrimination.Memory and Cognition, 1973,1, 395–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, B. D. Applying learning theory and instructional film principles to films for learning observation skills.AV Communication Review 1972,20, 281–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, J. M. L. The necessity of learning how to see film.AV Communication Review, 1955,3, 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plost, M., & Rosen, M. J. Effect of sex of career models on occupational preferences of adolescents.AV Communication Review, 1974,22, 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter, C. M. Sex of the speaker, sex of the listener, and listening comprehension.Journal of Communication, 1972,22, 64–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severin, W. J. The effectiveness of relevant pictures in multi-channel communication.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 386–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V.The influence of listener perception of the speaker on psycholinguistic processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1975.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearson, B.D. Effects of narrator gender on conceptual learning. ECTJ 28, 203–208 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765367

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765367

Keywords

Navigation