Skip to main content
Log in

Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction

  • Articles
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some studies of computer-assisted instruction have shown that when students control the amount of instruction they receive, they often terminate too early and fail to learn what they should. While sophisticated adaptive systems may eliminate the problem of premature termination of study, they neglect the important goal of learner responsibility. These researchers were interested in whether giving learners information about their achievement in relation to the criterion during instruction would improve learning in both learner-controlled and program-controlled systems. Success was measured in terms of posttest scores, time on task, and number of instructional examples required during instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference Notes

  1. Bunderson, C. V.Team production of learner-controlled courseware: A progress report (ICUE Technical Report No. 1). Provo, Utah: Institute for Computer Uses in Education, May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tiemann, P. W., Kroeker, L. P., & Markle, S. M.Teaching verbally-mediated coordinate concepts in an ongoing college course. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1977.

References

  1. DiVesta, F. J. Trait-treatment interactions, cognitive processes, and research on communication media.AV Communications Review, 1975,23, 185–196.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Felixbrod, J. J., & O’Leary, K. D. Self-determination of academic standards by children: Toward freedom from external control.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974,66, 845–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansen, K., & Tennyson, R. D. Review of the theory and research on the computer-based Minnesota Adaptive Instructional System.Educational Psychobgist, in press.

  4. Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D.Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Park, O., & Tennyson, R. D. Adaptive design strategies for selecting number and presentation of examples in coordinate concept acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychobgy, 1980,72, 362–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothen, W., & Tennyson, R. D. Application of Bayes’s theory in designing computer-based adaptive instructional strategies.Educational Psychologist, 1978,12, 317–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinberg, E. R. Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1977, 3, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tennyson, C. L., Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. Content structure and management strategies as design variables in concept acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychobgy, 1980, 72, 499–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tennyson, R. D. Evaluation technology in instructional development.Journal of Instructional Devebpment, 1978, 2(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tennyson, R. D. Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 525–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tennyson, R. D., Chao, J. N., and Youngers, J. Concept learning effectiveness using prototype and skill development presentation forms.Journal of Educational Psychobgy, in press.

  12. Tennyson, R. D., & Park, O. The teaching of concepts: A review of instructional design research literature.Review of Educational Research, 1980,50, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. Pretask and ontask adaptive design strategies for selecting number of instances in concept acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977,69, 586–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. Management of computer-based instruction: Design of an adaptive control strategy.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1979, 5, 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tennyson, R.D., Buttrey, T. Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction. ECTJ 28, 169–176 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765363

Keywords

Navigation