Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Receptivity of female remating and sperm number in the sperm storage organ in the bean bug,Riptortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the number of sperm in the seminal receptacle (spermatheca) and the receptivity of female remating in the bean bugRiptortus clavatus Thunberg. On the 21 st day after the first mating when receptivity to remating was > 70%, females receptive to remating had significantly fewer sperm ( < 40 on average) in the spermathecae than females reluctant to do (about 150 on average). However, averages of the number of eggs laid by receptive and reluctant females within 21 days were almost same. The proportion of fertilized eggs for receptive females at 15–21 days after copulation was significantly lower than that for reluctant females. Spermatozoa transferred from a male to a female’s spermatheca were detected 5 min after copulation and then increased continuously to about 500 with the first hour. When copulation durations were manipulated artificially, the shorter the copulation period (=females had less sperm in their spermathecae), the higher the remating rate became. Females may perceive the number of sperm in their seminal receptacles and then determine whether they copulate or not. These results support the hypothesis that females mate multiply in order to replenish inadequate sperm supplies to fertilize all eggs produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, S. J. and T. Halliday (1988) Multiple mating: natural selection is not evolution.Animal Behaviour 36: 1547–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948) Intra-sexual selection inDrosophila.Heredity 2: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. L. and L. E. Gilbert(1979) Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating.Science 206: 83–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. S., E. Stumm-Zollinger, T. Aigaki, J. Balmer, M. Bienz and P. Bohlen(1988) A male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behavior of femaleD. melanogaster.Cell 54: 291–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curtsinger, J. W. (1991) Sperm competition and the evolution of multiple mating.American Naturalist 138: 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, B. A. (1984) Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. pp. 291–370.In R. L. Smith(ed.)Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1985)Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1994) Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice.Evolution 48: 711–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, M. H. and T. A. Markow(1993) Courtship and remating in field populations ofDrosophila.Animal Behaviour 45: 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, M. H. and D. W. Pyle (1978) Sperm competition, male fitness and repeated mating by femaleDrosophila melanogaster.Evolution 32: 588–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, M. H., M. E. Newport and M. G. Kortier(1984) Sperm dependence of receptivity to remating inDrosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 1273–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne, D. T. (1984) Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bush crickets.Nature 307: 361–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. and S. J. Arnold (1987) Multiple mating by females: a perspective from quantitative genetics.Animal Behaviour 35: 939–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, P. H. and R. M. May (1989) Copulation dynamics: out for the sperm count.Nature 337: 508–509.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y. and Y. Tsubaki (1991) Effect of spermatophore size on female remating in the armyworm,Pseudaletia separata. Journal of Ethology 9: 47–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers, B., G. R. Verheyen, M. Van den Broeck, T. Burke, C. Van Broeckhoven and A. A. Dhondt (1992) Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit.Nature 357: 494–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T., R. Shine, J. Loman and T. Hakansson(1992) Why do female adders copulate so frequently?Nature 355: 440–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1962) A sperm factor affecting the receptivity ofDrosophila melanogaster females.Nature 194: 252–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, A. (1967) The control of sexual receptivity in femaleDrosophila.Animal Behaviour 15: 239–250.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. K. (1980) Sperm precedence and prolonged copulation in the southern green stink bug,Nezara viridula.Journal of Georgia Entomological Society 16: 70–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLain, D. K. (1989) Prolonged copulation as a post-insemination guarding tactics in a natural population of the ragwort seed bug.Animal Behaviour 38: 659–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser, K. S. (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 25: 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G. A. (1992) Snakes and female sexuality.Nature 355: 395–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyle, D. W. and M. H. Gromko (1978) Repeated mating by femaleDrosophila melanogaster: the Actaptive significance.Experimentia 34: 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. D. (1996) Animal breeding systems.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects.Biological Review 63: 509–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, T. (1996) Multiple mating and its effect on female reproductive output in the bean bugRiptortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae).Annals of the Entomological Society of America 89: 481–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffé, H. (1959)The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. M. and C. R. B. Boake (1992) Sexual dimorphism in remating in HawaiianDrosophila species.Animal Behaviour 44: 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (1986) Inhibition of femaleDrosophila melanogaster remating by a seminal fluid protein (esterase 6).Evolution 40: 1084–1091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, P. W. and D. F. Westneat (1988) Multiple mating and quantitative genetics.Animal Behavior 36: 1545–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, L. W. (1986) Female choice in the field cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer).Animal Behaviour 34: 1463–1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillén-Tullberg, B. (1981) Prolonged copulation: a male ‘postcopulatory’ strategy in a promiscuous species,Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae).Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf (1981)Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1976) Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behavior inBittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera).American Naturalist 110: 529–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. and J. Alcock (1983)The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. pp. 136–179.In B. Campbell (ed.)Sexual selection and the decent of man. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, W. F. (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects.American Naturalist 115: 780–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe, M. (1988) Multiple matings increase the fecundity of the yellow swallowtail butterfly,Papilio xuthus L., summer generations.Journal of Insect Behavior 1: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1975)Sex and evolution Prinston University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasui, Y. (1997) A “good-sperm” model can explain the evolution of costly multiple mating by females.American Naturalist 149: 573–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Tamito Sakurai

    Present address: Laboratory of Biological Communication, Research Institute for Bioresources, Okayama University, 710-0046, Kurashiki, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Applied Entomology, Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, 464-8601, Nagoya, Japan

    Tamito Sakurai

Authors
  1. Tamito Sakurai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tamito Sakurai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakurai, T. Receptivity of female remating and sperm number in the sperm storage organ in the bean bug,Riptortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae). Res Popul Ecol 40, 167–172 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765237

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765237

Key words

Search

Navigation