Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kin-related social organization in a winter population of the voleClethrionomys rufocanus

  • Special Feature
  • Published:
Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract

Kinship amongClethrionomys rufocanus was investigated during the winter of 1992/93 in a 3-ha enclosure using both molecular and catch-mark-release techniques. Forty-six adult voles (22 males and 24 females) having high heterozygosities, which were collected from several natural populations, were released into the enclosure on 29 September 1992. Most fall-born individuals of both sexes stayed in their natal site during the non-breeding period (December–March), although reproductively active females dispersed during the fall breeding season (October–November). These philopatric individuals aggregated and formed an maternal family in the winter. Several females which failed to reproduce were solitary during this season. Some individuals which were derived from several families also aggregated into a mixed lineage group. Survival rate of fall-born voles from earlier litters was higher than that from later ones. Maternal families broke up soon after the onset of spring reproduction. Most females established a territory near the wintering site and made a kincluster, in which close relatives neighbored each other. Maternal families in winter bring about female kin-clusters in spring, which may influence reproductive output in the breeding season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, H. (1976) Population structure and reproductive activity ofClethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae (Thomas) in a wind shelterbelt of the Ishikari plain, Hokkaido.Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan 7: 17–30 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berteaux, D., J-M. Bergeron, D. W. Thomas and H. Lapierre (1996) Solitude versus gregariousness: do physical benefits drive the choice in overwintering meadow voles?Oikos 76: 330–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjornstad, O. N., S. Champely, N. C. Stenseth and T. Saitoh (1996) Cyclicity and stability of grey-sided voles,Clethrionomys rufocanus, of Hokkaido: spectral and principal components analyses.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 351: 867–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnstad, O. N., N. C. Stenseth, T. Saitoh and O. C. Lingjærde (1998) Mapping the regional transition to cyclicity inClethrionomys rufocanus: spectral densities and functional data analysis.Researches on Population Ecology 40: 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, R., C. J. Krebs, M. S. Gaines, M. L. Johnson and I. T. M. Craine (1987) Natal philopatry and breeding systems in voles (Microtus spp.).Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 655–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujalska, G. (1975) Reproduction and mortality of bank voles and the changes in the size of an island population.Acta Theriologica 20: 41–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dewa, H. (1975) Seasonal variation of daily activity rhythms in snow season.Research Bulletin of College Experimental Forests Hokkaido University 22: 105–120 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimaki, Y. (1969) The fluctuations in the number of small rodents.Bulletin of the Hokkaido Forest Experiment Station 7: 62–77 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L. L., B. McGuire, T. Pizzuto, J. E. Hofmann and B. Frase (1993) Social organization of the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster).Journal of Mammalogy 74: 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grodziński, W., M. Makomaska, R. Tertil and J. Weiner (1977) Bioenergetics and total impact of vole populations.Oikos 29: 494–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. P., J. R. Speakman and P. A. Racey (1992) The contributions of local heating and reducing exposed surface area to the energetic benefits of huddling by short-tailed field voles (Microtus agrestis).Physiological Zoology 65: 742–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayne, D. W. (1949) Calculation of size of home range.Journal of Mammalogy 30: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R. A. (1987) Responses in spatial organization and behaviour to manipulations of the food resource in the voleClethrionomys rufocanus.Journal of Animal Ecology 56: 585–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R. A. (1989) Kinship and origin effects on dispersal and space sharing inClethrionomys rufocanus.Ecology 70: 607–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R. A. (1990) Determinants of natal dispersal and space use in grey-sided voles,Clethrionomys rufocanus: a combined field and laboratory experiment.Oikos 57: 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ims, R. A. and H. P. Andreassen (1991) Does kinship influence space use and dispersal in male grey-sided voles?Oikos 62: 216–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, Y., T. Saitoh, S. Abe and M. C. Yoshida (1995) Polymorphic microsatellite DNA markers in the grey red-backed voleClethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae.Molecular Ecology 4: 127–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, Y., T. Saitoh, S. Abe and M. C. Yoshida (1997) Sex-related spatial kin structure in a spring population of grey-sided volesClethrionomys rufocanus as revealed by mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA analyses.Molecular Ecology 6: 63–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibashi, Y., T. Saitoh and M. Kawata (1998) Social organization of the voleClethrionomys rufocanus and its demographic and genetic consequences: a review.Researches on Population Ecology 40: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalela, O. (1957) Regulation of reproduction rate in subarctic populations of the voleClethrionomys rufocanus (Sund.).Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Series A IV, Biologica 34: 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawata, M. (1987) The effect of kinship on spacing among female red-backed voles,Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae.Oecologia 72: 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawata, M. (1989) Growth and dispersal timing in male red-backed volesClethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae.Oikos 54: 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, X. and C. J. Krebs (1991) Can changes in female relatedness influence microtine population dynamics?Oikos 61: 126–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, X. and C. J. Krebs (1993) Influence of female relatedness on the demography of Townsend’s vole populations in spring.Journal of Animal Ecology 62: 536–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, X. and N. G. Yoccoz (1998) The impact of population kin-structure on nestling survival in Townsend’s voles,Microtus townsendii.Journal of Animal Ecology 67: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D. M. (1984) Group nesting and its ecological and evolutionary significance in overwintering microtine rodents. pp. 267–274.In J. F. Merritt (ed.)Winter ecology of small mammals. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D. M. and W. J. McShea (1987) Seasonal changes in reproductive tolerance, spacing, and social organization in meadow voles: a microtine model.American Zoologist 27: 899–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D. M., R. W. FitzGerald and W. J. McShea (1984) Dynamics of social nesting in overwintering meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus): possible consequences for population cycling.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15: 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mappes, T., H. Ylönen and J. Viitala (1995) Higher reproductive success among kin groups of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus).Ecology 76: 1276–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, J. F. (ed.) (1984)Winter ecology of small mammals. Special Publication of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, B. and L. L. Getz (1995) Communal nesting in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): an evaluation of costs and benefits based on patterns of dispersal and settlement.Canadian Journal of Zoology 73: 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea, W. J. (1990) Social tolerance and proximate mechanisms of dispersal among winter groups of meadow voles,Microtus pennsylvanicus.Animal Behaviour 39: 346–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R. S. (1985) Limiting resources and territoriality in microtine rodents.American Naturalist 126: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R. S. (1990) The ecology of territoriality in small mammals.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 5: 411–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz, K., G. Bujalska, R. Andrzejewski and J. Gliwicz (1971) Productivity processes in an island population ofClethrionomys glareolus.Annales Zoologici Fennici 8: 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrusewicz, K., A. Górecki, W. Grodziński and J. Kozlowski (1983) Productivity and energetics.Acta Theriologica 28 Supplement1: 173–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh, T. (1987) A time series and geographical analysis of population dynamics of the red-backed vole in Hokkaido, Japan.Oecologia 73: 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh, T. (1989) Communal nesting and spatial structure in an early spring population of the grey red-backed vole,Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae.Journal of the Mammalogical Society of Japan 14: 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh, T. (1995) Sexual differences in natal dispersal and philopatry of the grey-sided vole.Researches on Population Ecology 37: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh, T., O. N. Bjørnstad and N. C. Stenseth (1998a) Densitydependence in voles and mice: a comparative study.Ecology (in press).

  • Saitoh, T., N. C. Stenseth and O. N. Bjørnstad (1998b) The population dynamics of the vole,Clethrionomys rufocanus, in Hokkaido.Researches on Population Ecology 40: 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvioni, M. and W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (1995) Social organization and space use in California voles: seasonal, sexual, and age-specific strategies.Oecologia 101: 426–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch and T. Maniatis (1989)Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sera, W. E. and M. S. Gaines (1994) The effect of relatedness on spacing behavior and fitness of female prairie voles.Ecology 75: 1560–1566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS Inc. (1995)SPSS for Windows. Release 6.1.3. SPSS Inc., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth, N. C., O. N. Bjørnstad and T. Saitoh (1996) A gradient from stable to cyclic populations ofClethrionomys rufocanus in Hokkaido, Japan.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263: 1117–1126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenseth, N. C., O. N. Bjørnstad and T. Saitoh (1998) Seasonal forcing on the dynamics ofClethrionomys rufocanus: modeling geographic gradients in population dynamics.Researches on Population Ecology 40: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickel, F. (1954) A comparison of certain methods of measuring ranges of small mammals.Journal of Mammalogy 35: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viitala, J. (1977) Social organization in cyclic subarctic populations of the volesClethrionomys rufocanus (Sund.) andMicrotus agrestis (L.).Annales Zoologici Fennici 14: 53–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, S. D. and H. T. Dublin (1984) Behavioral strategies of small mammals under winter conditions: solitary or social? pp. 293–298.In J. F. Merritt (ed.)Winter ecology of small mammals. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. O. (1985) Behavior. pp. 340–372.In R. H. Tamarin (ed.)Biology of new world Microtus. The American Society of Mammalogists, Special Publication No. 8.

  • Wolff, J.O. (1993) Why are female small mammals territorial?Oikos 68: 364–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. O. (1995) Friends and strangers in vole population cycles.Oikos 73: 411–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J. O. and W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (1981) Communal winter nesting and food sharing in taiga voles.Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9: 237–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen, H., T. Mappes and J. Viitala (1990) Different demography of friends and strangers: an experiment on the impact of kinship and familiarity inClethrionomys glareolus.Oecologia 83: 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylönen, H., J. Pusenius and J. Viitala (1995) Impact of kinship and familiarity on the annual social organization and population dynamics ofClethrionomys andMicrotus voles.Annales Zoologici Fennici 32: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoccoz, N. G., K. Nakata, N. C. Stenseth and T. Saitoh (1998) The demography ofClethrionomys rufocanus: from mathematical and statistical models to further field studies.Researches on Population Ecology 40: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chromosome Research Unit, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, North 10, West 8, 060-0810, Sapporo, Japan

    Yasuyuki Ishibashi, Syuiti Abe & Michihiro C. Yoshida

  2. Hokkaido Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 062-8516, Sapporo, Japan

    Takashi Saitoh

Authors
  1. Yasuyuki Ishibashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takashi Saitoh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Syuiti Abe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michihiro C. Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuyuki Ishibashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishibashi, Y., Saitoh, T., Abe, S. et al. Kin-related social organization in a winter population of the voleClethrionomys rufocanus . Res Popul Ecol 40, 51–59 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765221

Key words

Search

Navigation