Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction

Abstract

This article describes a statistical integration of findings from 74 studies of visualbased college teaching. In the typical study, students learned slightly more from visual-based instruction than from conventional teaching. In the typical study, visual-based instruction had no special effect on course completion, student attitudes, or the correlation between aptitude and achievement. Students were equally likely to complete visual-based and conventional classes; their attitudes toward the two kinds of classes were very similar; and aptitude played a strong role in determining student achievement in each kind of class.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Biglan, A. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1973,58, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, G. H., & Glass, G. V. The external validity of experiments.American Educational Research Journal, 1968,5, 437–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching. Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, G. C., & Schramm, W.Learning from television: What the research says. Stanford, Calif.: Institute for Communication Research, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubin, R., & Hedley, R. A.The medium may be related to the message: College instruction by TV. Eugene, Oreg.: University of Oregon Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G. V. Primary, secondary, and metaanalysis of research.Educational Researcher, 1976,5, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, P. D., Jr.Television research in the teaching-learning process. Detroit, Mich.: Wayne State University, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Cohen, P. A., & Ebeling, B. J. Effectiveness of programmed instruction in higher education: A meta-analysis of findings.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980, 2(6), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A. A meta-analysis of outcome studies of Kelleŕs personalized system of instruction.American Psychologist, 1979,34, 307–318. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A. Research on audiotutorial instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.Research in Higher Education, 1979,11, 321–340. (b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L. C., & Cohen, P. A. Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings.Review of Educational Research, 1980,50, 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumata, H.An inventory of instructional television research. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Educational Television and Radio Center, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B., & Glass, G. V. Choice of the metric for effect size in meta-analysis.American Educational Research Journal, 1980,17, 325–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, H. F., Jr.Instructional television as a medium of teaching in higher education. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, K. D. The first of the Title VII reports: A Review.AV Communication Review, 1961,9 (4), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. C., & MacLennon, D. W.Research in instructional television and film. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W. L.The research on programmed instruction. Stanford, Calif.: Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stickell, D. W.A critical review of the methodology and results of research comparing televised and face-to-face instruction. Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, 1963. (University Microfilms No. 64-1419)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by National Science Foundation Grant SED 77-18566.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, P.A., Ebeling, B.J. & Kulik, J.A. A meta-analysis of outcome studies of visual-based instruction. ECTJ 29, 26–36 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765190

Keywords

  • Withdrawal Rate
  • Student Attitude
  • Educational Television
  • Instructional Television
  • Achievement Outcome