Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to “quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program?”

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Letters

Abstract

Because Bohm’s Interpretation models particles with continuous trajectories, a natural property to attribute to a Bohmian particle is atunneling time, the time it takes for a particle to pass through a barrier. We also attribute a property-a different property-named ‘tunneling time’ to Copenhagen systems, systems that do not have particles with continuous trajectories. Cushing presents a discussion of the possibility of measuring Bohmian particle tunneling time; however, as becomes clear when considering the differences between properties named ‘tunneling time,’ he incorrectly argues that if such a measurement were possible, the measurement might constitute an empirical test between the Copenhagen interpretation and Bohm’s interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Cushing,Found. Phys. 25, 269 (1995).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. C.R. Leavens and W.R. McKinnon,Phys. Lett. A 194, 12 (1994).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedard, K. Reply to “quantum tunneling times: A crucial test for the causal program?”. Found Phys Lett 10, 183–187 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764238

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764238

Key words

Navigation