Abstract
This article proposes that the ‘renewal’ of Dewey might contribute to filling the gap between the pedagogical commitment to contingency and plurality and the fact that the pedagogical tradition, until now, has neutralized contingency and denied its systematic meaning for education. Therefore, the main traits of the ‘renewal of Dewey’ are shown in the work of some Dewey scholars who, critically and creatively, reconstruct Dewey in the mirror of poststructural, communicational and constructive theory developments. Following Dewey, these researches balance the objective evaluation of Dewey’s work by a deliberate and overt pursuit of their own intentions and (pre-)selections by the scholars. Intersubjectivity and communication are key concepts in this renewal of pragmatism rejecting the subject-centered philosophy of consciousness, the traditional western epistemology and metaphysics. The turn to the philosophical priority of the unforeseeable also leads to an understanding of action as an essential focus. In this context Dewey’s pragmatistic view of radical democracy is received as a non-foundational theory and the concept of consensus is criticized. The scholars clarify that the boundaries of the subject are broadened by communicative destabilization. At the end of the article it is asked what the renewal-dimensions mean for education located in the public sphere.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Biesta, Gert: 1994, ‘Education as Practical Intersubjectivity: Towards a Critical-Pragmatic Understanding of Education’, Educational Theory44, 299–317.
Biesta, Gert: 1995a, ‘Pragmatism as a Pedagogy of Communicative Action’, in Jim Garrison (ed.),The New Scholarship on Dewey, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 105–122.
Biesta, Gert: 1995b, ‘Education/Communication: The Two Faces of Communicative Pedagogy’,Philosophy of Education, 185–194.
Biesta, Gert: 1995c, ‘Postmodernism and the Repolitization of Education’,Interchange 26, 161–183.
Biesta, Gert: 1998a, ‘Pedagogy without Humanism: Foucault and the Subject of Education’,Interchange 29, 1–16.
Biesta, Gert and Miedema, Siebren: 1996, ‘Dewey in Europe: A Case Study on the International Dimensions of the Turn-of-the Century Educational Reform’,American Journal of Education 105, 1–26.
Biesta, Gert: 1998b, ‘Mead, Intersubjectivity and Education: the Early Writings’,Studies in Philosophy and Education 17, 73–99.
Biesta, Gert: 1998c, ‘Deconstruction, justice and the question of education’,Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 1, 395–411.
Biesta, Gert J.J.: 1999, ‘Radical Intersubjectivity. Reflections on the ‘Different’ Foundation of Education’,Studies in Philosophy and Education 18, 203–220.
Boisvert, Raymond D.: 1989, ‘Rorty, Dewey and Post-Modern Metaphysics’,The Southern Journal of Philosophy 27, 173–193.
Englund, Tomas: 1996, ‘The Public and the Text’,J. Curriculum Studies 28, 1–35.
Festenstein, Matthew: 1997, ‘The Ties of Communication: Dewey on Ideal and Political Democracy’,History of Political Thought XVIII, 104–124.
Garrison, James W.: 1985, ‘Dewey and The Empirical Unity of Opposites’,Transactions of the Charles Peirce Soc. 21, 549–561.
Garrison, James W.: 1990, “The Paradox of Indoctrination: A Hermeneutical Solution’,Philosophy of Education 46, 396–402.
Garrison, Jim: 1994, ‘Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research’,Educational Researcher, 5–15.
Garrison, Jim: 1995, ‘Introduction’, in Jim Garrison (ed.),The New Scholarship on Dewey, Dordrecht Kluwer, pp. 1–6.
Garrison, Jim: 1996a, ‘A Deweyan Theory of Democratic Listening’,Educational Theory 46, 429–451.
Garrison, Jim: 1996b, ‘Dewey, Qualitative Thought, and Context’,International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 9, 391–410.
Garrison, Jim: 1997a,Dewey and Eros. Wisdom and Desire in the Art of Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York/London.
Garrison, Jim: 1997b, ‘An Alternative to Von Glaserfeld’s Subjectivism in Science Education: Deweyan Social Constructivism’,Science and Education 6, 301–312 (543–554).
Garrison, Jim: 1998a, ‘John Dewey’s Philosophy as Education’, in Larry A. Hickman (ed.),Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a Postmodern Generation, pp. 63–81.
Garrison, Jim: 1998b, ‘Foucault, Dewey, and Self-Creation’,Educational Philosophy and Theory 30, 111–134.
Garrison, Jim: 1998c, ‘A Philosophical History of the Idea of the ‘Democratic Public’ in the United States: A Provocative Emersonian and Deweyan Pragmatic Perspective’, Z. f. PÄdagogik, 38. Beiheft, hg. von J. Oelkers: Bildung, öffentlichkeit und Demokratie. Beltz, Weinheim/Basel, pp. 143–164.
Garrison, Jim: 1999, ‘Dewey, Derrida and the Metaphysics of Presence’,Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35, 364–372.
Gouinlock, James: 1995, ‘What is the Legacy of Instrumentalism? Rorty’s Interpretation of Dewey’, in H.J. Saatkamp Jr (ed.),Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to his Critics, Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 72–91.
Hickman, Larry, A.: 1998, ‘Introduction’, in Larry A. Hickman (ed.),Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a Postmodern Generation, Indiana University Press, pp. ix-xxi.
Joas, Hans: 1989,Praktische IntersubjektivitÄt, Die Entwicklung des Werkes von George Herbert Mead, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Joas, Hans: 1993, ‘Gemeinschaft und Demokratie in den USA. Die vergessene Vorgeschichte der Kommunitarismus-Diskussion’, in M. Brumlik and H. Brunkhorst (eds.),Gemeinschaft und Gerechtigkeit, Fischer, Frankfurt, pp. 49–62.
Joas, Hans: 1996,Die KreativitÄt des Handelns, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.
Kettner, Matthias: 1998, ‘John Deweys demokratische Experimentiergemeinschaft’, in Hauke Brunkhorst (ed.),Demokratischer Experimentalismus. Politik in der komplexen Gesellschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp. 44–66.
Ljunggren, Carsten: 1996, ‘Education, Media and Democracy: On Communication and the Nature of the Public in the Light of John Dewey, Walter Lippmann and the Discussion of Modernity’,J. Curriculum Studies 28(1), 73–90.
Ljunggren, Carsten: 1999, ‘Questions on Identity and Education — Democracy Between Past and Future’, in C.A. SÄfström (ed.),Identity. Questioning the Logic of Identity within Educational Theory, Studentlitteratur, Lund, pp. 47–60.
Ljunggren, Carsten: 1999a,The Public Has to Define Itself-Dewey on Democracy and Individuality. Ms 1999 örebro/Sweden.
Masschelein, Jan: 1992, ‘PÄdagogisches Handeln und Verantwortung. Erziehung als Antwort’, in KÄthe Meyer-Drawe, Helmut Peukert and Jörg Ruhloff (eds.),PÄdagogik und Ethik. BeitrÄge zu einer zweiten Reflexion, Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim, pp. 81–104.
Mouffe, Chantal: 1999, ‘Dekonstruktion, Pragmatismus und die Politik der Demokratie’, in Chantal Mouffe (ed.),Dekonstruktion und Pragmatismus. Demokratie, Wahrheit und Vernunft, Passagen, Wien, pp. 11–36.
Neiman, Alven: 1996, ‘Rorty’s Dewey: Pragmatism, Education and the Public Sphere’,Studies in Philosophy and Education 15, 121–129.
Neubert, Stefan: 1998,Erkenntnis, Verhalten und Kommunikation. John Deweys Philosophie des ’Experience’ in interaktionisch-konstruktivistischer Interpretation, Waxmann Verlag, Münster.
Neubert, Stefan: 1998a, ‘Der Diskurs der Demokratie bei John Dewey’,Das Argument. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften No. 227 40(H.5), S. 631–644.
Neubert, Stefan: 1999, ‘Kunst als Erfahrung — KreativitÄt aus pÄdagogisch-konstruktivistischer Sicht’, in Landesverband der Kunstschulen Niedersachsen (ed.),Kunstschule im Kontext — die Grammatik von KreativitÄt, LKD-Verlag Lingen, pp. 18–31.
Oelkers, Jürgen: 1992,Bildung im System: Widerspruch zwischen Bildungszielen und Effizienz, Manuskript Bern.
Oelkers, Jürgen: 1997,John Deweys Philosophie der Erziehung: Eine theoriegeschichtliche Analyse, Manuskript Bern, 24 pp.
Oelkers, Jürgen: 1999, ‘Gibt es eine ‘Mitte’ der Erziehung? überlegungen zum Zentralbegriff der PÄdagogik’, in T. Fuhr and K. Schultheis (eds.),Zur Sache der PÄdagogik, Untersuchungen zum Gegenstand der allgemeinen Erziehungswissenschaft, Klinkhardt, Bad Heilbrunn, pp. 55–67.
Rorty, Richard: 1982,Consequences of Pragmatism (Essays: 1972–1980), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Rorty, Richard: 1988, ‘Der Vorrang der Demokratie vor der Philosophie’ in Richard Rorty (ed.),SolidaritÄt oder ObjektivitÄt?Philosophische Essays’, Reclam Stuttgart, pp. 82–125 (Orig. 1987).
Rorty, Richard: 1994,Hoffnung statt Erkenntnis, Passagen Verlag, Wien.
Rorty, Richard: 1995, ‘Response to Gouinlock’, in H.J. Saatkamp Jr (ed.),Rorty and Pragmatism: The Philosopher Responds to His Critics, Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 91–99.
Rorty, Richard: 1997,Der Spiegel der Natur, Eine Kritik der Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt 4.
Auflage/Orig.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press.
Shusterman, Richard: 1995, ‘Pragmatismus und Liberalismus’, in Chr. Demmerling and T. Rentsch (eds.),Die Gegenwart der Gerechtigkeit: Diskurse zwischen Recht, praktischer Philosophie und Politik, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 155–180.
Wain, Kenneth: 1995, ‘Richard Rorty, Education, and Politics’,Educational Theory 45, 395–409.
Wolf, Jean-Claude: 1996, ‘Pragmatismus mit oder ohne Methode? Rorty versus Dewey’, in J. u.a. Freudiger (ed.),Der Begriff der Erfahrung in der Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts, Beck, München, pp. 231–246.
Ziehe, Thomas: 1996, ‘Vom Preis des selbstbezüglichen Wissens’, in Arno Combe and Werner Helsper (eds.),PÄdagogische ProfessionalitÄt, Untersuchungen zum Typus pÄdagogischen Handelns, Frankfurt, pp. 924–942.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehmann-Rommel, R. The renewal of dewey — trends in the nineties. Stud Philos Educ 19, 187–218 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764159
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764159