Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patently absurd: The ethical implications of software patents

  • Features
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bessen, J., & Hunt, R. (2004, March).The software patent experiment. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.researchoninnovation.org/softpat.pdf

  • Bessen, f., & Meurer, M. J. (2005, August).The patent litigation explosion. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.researchoninnovation.org/lit.pdf

  • Brown, A. W. (2000).The software industry-Is the glass half-full or half-empty? Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://www.cbd-hq.com/articles/2000/000115ab_thesoftwareindustry.asp

  • Computer Industry Almanac, Incorporated. (2005, March). Press release: PCs in-use surpassed 820M in 2004, PCs in-use will top 1 B in 2007. Retrieved September 28, 2005, from http://www.c-i-a.com/pr0305.htm

  • Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Diehr et al., 450 U.S. 175. (1981). Retrieved September 28, 2005, from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US& vol=450& invol=175

  • Gleick, J. (2000, March 12). Patently absurd.New York Times Magazine. Retrieved September 5, 2005, from http://www.nytimes.com/library/magazine/home/20000312mag-patents.html

  • League for Programming Freedom. (1991).Against software patents. Retrieved September 3, 2005, from http://lpf.ai.mit.edu/Patents/against-software-patents.html

  • Levine, L., & Saunders, K. M. (2004).Software patents: Innovation or litigation? In Proceedings of IFIP 8.6 Working Conference: IT Innovation for Adaptiveness and Competitive Advantage, May 31-June 2, 2004. Leixlip, Ireland

  • Microsoft Corporation. (2004). U.S. Patent No. 6,727,830. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

  • Perens, B. (2004).The problem of software patents in standards. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://perens.com/Articles/PatentFarming.html

  • Perl Foundation. (2005).General questions about Perl. Retrieved September 14, 2005, from http://faq.perl.org/perlfaql.html

  • Pollock, R., Kavanagh, L., & Maebe, J. (2004). Software patents and the current EU legislation. FFII Software Patents Workgroup. Retrieved September 7, 2005, from http://www.ffii.org.uk/swpat/swpat.html

  • Quinn, E. R., Jr. (2005).How much does a patent cost? Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http:/www.ipwatchdog.com/patent_cost.html

  • Spinello, R. A. (2003).Case studies in information technology ethics (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallman, R. (2005).Bill Gates and other communists. Retrieved September 2, 2005, from http://news.com.com/Bill+Gates+and+other+communists/2010-1071_3-5576230.html

  • United States Census Bureau. (2001).Home computers and internet use in the United States: August 2000. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2001).Table 5B. Use of a computer at home, school,or work and the internet at any location for people 18 years and over,by selected characteristics. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http:// www.census.gov/population/socdemo/computer/ppl-175/tab05B.pdf

  • U.S. Constitution, Article I, § 8. Retrieved September 28, 2005, from http://www.house.gov/Constitution/Constitution.html

  • U.S. Copyright Office. (n.d.).Copyrightin general. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.copyright.gov/help/faq/faq-general.html

  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (2005).General information concerning patents. Retrieved September 6, 2005, from http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/doc/general/index.html#patent

  • Vuorikari, R., & Sarnow, K. (2004).Software patents-A potential hindrance of ICT in education. Retrieved September 3, 2005, from http://www.eun.org/insight-pdf/special_reports/e_learning_softpat.pdf

Download references

Authors
  1. Chris D. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stark, C.D. Patently absurd: The ethical implications of software patents. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 49, 58–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02763733

Keywords

Search

Navigation