Abstract
When parameterizing a process model, it is best to use real data based on laboratory and field experimentation to directly estimate the parameters. However, this is not always possible for many practical reasons. When “vague” parameter estimates are used in a process model, they should not be treated as though they were exact and without uncertainty. Vague parameters have uncertainty, and the uncertainty can be very large. This uncertainty should be explicitly accounted for. Traditional statistical techniques can not be used to estimate vague parameters. Presented here are some results of a study where the Maximum-Entropy Principle and the Bayesian method with weighted bootstrap sampling were used to estimate unobservable parameters of a pipe model calibrated for red pine (Pinus resinosa Ait.). An uncertainty analysis based on the estimated parameters was conducted. Three parameters of this model have been estimated to demonstrate the estimation methods and uncertainty analysis with varying amounts of information. The mean values of the estimated posterior distributions based on the two methods applied in this study were very close to those of their corresponding prior distributions. The Bayesian method provided distributions that were more concentrated than their priors. This study revealed that vague parameters lead to uncertainty and the resulting uncertainty can be decreased with the methods used in this paper. The reduction in uncertainty depends on the type and amount of information available.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Alcamo, J., Amann, M., Hettelingh, J.P., Holmberg, M., Hordijk, L., Kamari, J., Kauppi, L., Kauppi, P., Kornai, G., and Mäkelä, A. (1987). Acidification in Europe: A simulation model for evaluating control strategies. AMBIO 16: 232.
Bossel, H. (1994) TREEDYN3 forest simulation model: Mathematical model, program documentation, and simulation results. University Göttingen Press, Göttingen.
Botkin, D.B. (1989) Forest dynamics: An ecological model. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Box, G.E.P. and Tiao, G.C. (1992) Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. 608pp, Wiley Press, New York.
Carlin, B.P. and Louis, T.A. (1996) Bayes and empirical bayes methods for data analysis. 399pp, Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton.
Cox, N. (1977) Comparison of two uncertainty analysis methods. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 64: 258–265.
Fang, S. (1996) Dynamic procedure for assessing ecological conceptual models and improvement of the techniques of model assessment. M.S. thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA.
Gelfand, A.E., Hills, S.E., Racine-Poon, A., and Smith, A.F.M. (1990) Illustration of Bayesian inference in normal data models using Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85: 972–985.
Gertner, G.Z. and Guan, B. (1991) Using an error budget to evaluate the importance of component models within a large scale simulation model.In Proceedings to the Conference on Mathematical Modelling of Forest Ecosystems. J.D. Sauerländer’ Verlag., Frankfurt am Main, 62–74.
Gertner, G.Z., Parysow, P., and Guan, B. (1996) Projection variance partitioning of a conceptual forest growth model with orthogonal polynomials. Forest Sci. 42: 474–486.
Isebrands, J.G., Rauscher, H.M., Crow, T.R., and Dickmann, D.I. (1990) Whole-tree growth process models based on structural-functional relationships.In Process modelling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Dixon, R.K., Meldahl, R.S., Ruark, G.A., and Warren, W.G. (eds.), 450pp, Timber Press, Portland.
Jaynes, E.T. (1957) Information theory and statistical mechanics. Phys. Rev. 106: 620–630.
Kapur, J.N. (1989) Maximum-entropy models in science and engineering. 635pp, John Wiley Press, New York.
Kullback, S. (1959) Information theory and statistics. 395pp, Wiley Press.
Landsberg, J.J. and Gower, S.T. (1997) Application of physiological ecology for forest Management. 354pp, Academic Press, San Diego.
Ludlow, A.R., Randle, T.J., and Grace, J.C. (1990) Developing a process-based model for Sitka spruce.In Process modelling of forest growth responses to environmental stress. Dixon, R.K., Meldahl, R.S., Ruark, G.A., and Warren, W.G. (eds.), 450pp, Timber Press, Portland.
Mäkelä, A. (1986) Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. J. Theor. Biol. 123: 103–120.
Mäkelä, A. (1997) A carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. Forest Sci. 43: 255–261.
Mäkelä, A. and Hari, P. (1986) Stand growth model based on carbon uptake and allocation in individual trees. Ecol. Model. 33: 205–229.
Prentice, I.C., Sykes, M.T., and Cramer, W. (1993) A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes. Ecol. Model. 65: 51–70.
Rossing, W.A.H., Jansen, M.J.W., and Daaman, R.A. (1994) Uncertainty analysis applied to supervised control of aphids and brown rust in winter wheat. Part 2. Relative importance of different components of uncertainty. Agric. Syst. 44: 449–460.
Seber, G.A.F. and Wild, C.J. (1989) Nonlinear regression. 800pp, Wiley Press, New York.
Smith, A.F.M. and Gelfand, A.E. (1992) Bayesian statistics without tears: a sampling-resampling perspective. Am. Stat. 46 (2): 84–88.
Sobol, I.M. (1993) Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Model. Comput. Exp. 1 (4): 407–414.
Valentine, H. (1985) Tree-growth models: derivations employing the pipe model theory. J. Theor. Biol. 117: 579–585.
Valentine, H. (1988) A carbon balance model of stand growth: a derivation employing the pipe model theory and self-thinning rule. Ann. Bot. 62: 389–396.
Woodbury, A.D. (1993) Minimum relative entropy: Forward probabilistic modeling. Water Resour. Res. 29: 2847–2860.
Zeide, B. (1987) Analysis of the — 3/2 power law of self-thinning. Forest Sci. 33: 517–537.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, S., Gertner, G. & Price, D. Uncertainly analyses of a process model when vague parameters are estimated with entropy and Bayesian methods. J For Res 6, 13–19 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762717
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762717