Conclusion
The Strategic Impact Model is distinctive in its portrayal of the integration of instructional and non-instructional interventions and its suggestion that all performance interventions undergo an analysis-design-development-production cycle, just as instruction does. It also differs from other similar models in its use of evaluative activities at each stage to assure alignment with strategic needs as well as quality control, and its suggestions for improving the chances of successful implementation by carrying out change management activities at each phase of the development process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banathy, B. H. (1991).Systems design of education: A journey to create the future. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology Publications.
Brethower, D. & Smalley, K. (1998).Performance-based instruction: Linking training to business results. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
Dean, P.J. (1997). Thomas F. Gilbert Ph.D.: Engineering performance improvement with or without training. In Dean, P. J. & Ripley, D. E. (Eds.).Performance improvement pathfinders: Models for organi- zational learning (Chapter 3, pp. 45–64). Washington, DC:Interna- tional Society for Performance Improvement.
Dean, P.J. & Ripley, D. E. (Eds.). (1997).Performance improvement path- finders: Models for organizational learning. Washington, DC:Inter- national Society for Performance Improvement.
Dick, W., Carey, L. & Carey, J. O. (2000).The systematic design of instruc- tion (5th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Addison Wesley.
Drucker, P. F. (1974).Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Gilbert, T. F. (1996).Human competence: ISPI tribute edition: Engineering worthy performance. Washington, DC: International Society for Per- formance Improvement.
Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993).Reengineering the corporation: A mani- festo for business revolution. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Harless, J. H. (1975).An ounce of analysis (is worth a pound of objectives). Newnan, GA: Harless Performance Guild.
Introduction to performance technology. (1986). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
Kaufman, R., Thiagarajan, S. & Mac Gillis, P. (Eds.). (1997).The guidebook for perfor- mance improvement: Working with indi- viduals and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kern, T. (2003, April 22). Training vs. business.Online Learning News and Reviews. Ar- ticle 1. Retrieved June 4, 2003, from http: //www. vnulearning.com/archive.htm
Langdon, D. (2000).Aligning performance: Im- proving people, systems, and organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.
Mager, R. F., & Pipe, P. (1997).Analyzing per- formance problems: Or you really oughta wanna: How to figure out why people aren’t doing what they should be, and what to do about it (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: The Center for Effective Performance.
Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model.Performance Improvement, 42 (5), 34–36.
Molenda, M., Pershing, J. A., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1996). Designing instructional systems. In Craig, R. L. (Ed.).TheASTD training & development handbook: A guide to human resource development (pp. 266–293). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Pershing, J. A., & Lee, S. H. (2000) Transfer evaluation of knowledge and skill devel- opment: A case study of an instructional systems development training program.Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31 (1), 7–29.
Ripley, D. E. (1997). Joe Harless, Ed.D.: An ounce of analysis. In Dean, P. J. & Ripley, D. E. (Eds.).Performance improvement path- finders: Models for organizational learning (Chapter 6, pp. 92–107). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1989).Training for impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Romiszowski, A. J. (1981).Designing instruc- tional systems: Decision making in course planning and curriculum design. New York, NY: Nichols.
Rosenberg, M. J. (1994). The role of training in a performance-oriented organization. In Dean, P. J. (Ed.).Performance engineering at work (pp. 147–157). Batavia, IL: Inter- national Board of Standards for Training, Performance and Instruction.
Rothwell, W. J. (1996).Beyond training and development: State-of-the-art strategies for enhancing human performance. New York, NY: American Management Association.
Senge, P. M. (1990).The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
Van Tiem, D. M., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2000).Fundamentals of performance technology: A guide to improving people, process, and performance. Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.
Wile, D. (1996). Why doers do.Performance & Instruction, 35 (2), 30–35.
Additional information
He has special interests in distance education, historical and philosophical foundations of instructional technology and instructional development processes.
He has special interests in planning and evaluating performance improvement initiatives, including training.
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02763572.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molenda, M., Pershing, J.A. The strategic impact model: An integrative approach to performance improvement and instructional systems design. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 48, 26–33 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762540
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02762540