Skip to main content
Log in

Compensation-based stock trading by corporate executive and aggregate management ownership of the firm: Some additional evidence

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Managers place a low value on equity-based compensation because it exposes them to the risk of the firm. Such undervaluation and the need to achieve diversification may force a manager to sell his own stock of the firm in response to equity-based awards. In this paper we examine whether such stock selling by an executive depends on the aggregate level of management ownership of the firm. We argue that stock selling occurs at a high level of aggregate ownership where an executive has a low probability of being replaced. Our findings support this “management ownership” argument of compensation-based stock trading. One implication is that the board's effort to minimize agency conflicts becomes less effective once aggregate ownership increases to a certain threshold level. (JEL G30, G32)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acharya, V.V., K. John, and R.K. Sundaram. 2000. “On the Optimality of Resetting Executive Stock Options.”Journal of Financial Economics 57: 65–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, R.K., and A.A. Samwick. 1999. “The Other Side of the Trade-off: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation.”Journal of Political Economy 107: 65–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M.P. 1981. “Managerial Power and Tenure in the Large Corporation.”Social Forces 60: 482–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, M.P., and Sharon Panian. 1982. “Power Performance and Succession in the Large Corporation.”Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 538–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., and M. Scholes. 1973. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.”Journal of Political Economy 81: 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W. 1992. “Power and Managerial Dismissal: Scapegoating at the Top.”Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 400–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, M, R.K. Sundaram, and D. Yermack. 2000. “Altering the Terms of Executive Stock Options.”Journal of Financial Economics 57: 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J.N. 1998. “The Exercise and Valuation of Executive Stock Options.”Journal of Financial Economics 48: 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, L.Y., and H. DeAngelo. 1988. “Corporate Financial Policy and Corporate Control: A Study of Defensive Adjustments in Asset and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 20: 87–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis, David J., Diane K. Denis, and Atulya Sarin. 1997. “Ownership Structure and Top Executive Turnover.”Journal of Financial Economics 45: 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C. 1989. “Management Turnover and Financial Distress.”Journal of Financial Economics 25: 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S.C., and M.R. Vetsuypens. 1993. “CEO Compensation in Financially Distressed Firms: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Finance 48: 425–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.J., and J.B. Liebman. 2000. “The Taxation of Executive Compensation.”NBER/Tax Policy and the Economy 14: 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.J., and K.J. Murphy. 2000. “Optimal Exercise Prices for Executive Stock Options.”American Economic Review 90: 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.”Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and K.J. Murphy. 1990. “CEO Incentives—It's Not How Much You Pay, but How.”Harvard Business Review 68: 138–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C., and R.S. Ruback. 1985. “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence.”Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, V.A., and R.J. Limmack. 1996. “Takeover Activity, CEO Turnover, and the Market for Corporate Control.”Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 23: 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, L. 2002. “CEO Compensation, Diversification, and Incentives.”Journal of Financial Economics 66: 29–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, K.J., and J.J. McConnell. 1991. “Corporate Performance, Corporate Takeovers, and Management Turnover.”Journal of Finance 46: 671–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J.J., and H. Servaes. 1990. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.”Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEachern, W. 1975.Managerial Control and Performance. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehran, H. 1995. “Executive Compensation Structure, Ownership, and Firm Performance.”Journal of Financial Economics 38: 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meulbroek, L.K. 2001. “The Efficiency of Equity-Linked Compensation: Understanding the Full Cost of Awarding Executive Stock Options.”Financial Management 30: 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelson, W.H., and M.M. Partch. 1989. “Managers' Voting Rights and Corporate Control.”Journal of Financial Economics 25: 263–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ofek, E., and D. Yermack. 2000. “Taking Stock: Equity-Based Compensation and the Evolution of Managerial Ownership.”Journal of Finance 55: 1367–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, M.H., and R.A. Walkling. 1993. “The Impact of Managerial Ownership on Acquisition Attempts and Target Shareholder Wealth.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 28: 439–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P. 1989. “Top Management Turnover Following Mergers and Acquisitions.”Strategic Management Journal 10: 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, J.P., and J.W. Ellwood. 1991. “Mergers, Acquisitions, and the Pruning of Managerial Deadwood.”Strategic Management Journal 12: 201–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zahid Iqbal.

Additional information

This research was carried out with the support of the Western New England College research fund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iqbal, Z., Shetty, S. Compensation-based stock trading by corporate executive and aggregate management ownership of the firm: Some additional evidence. J Econ Finan 28, 270–284 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761617

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761617

Keywords

Navigation