Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of liquidity and information on the mispricing of newly public firms

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We test whether the mispricing of newly public firms is affected by liquidity and information during the quiet period, from the end of the quiet period until the lock-up expiration date, and post lock-up. Liquidity is affected by the underwriter’s stabilization efforts during the quiet period and the founder’s ability to sell shares in the post-lockup period. Based on a sample of winner and loser events for more than 2,600 newly public firms during 1992–2001, the degree of under-or overreaction is conditioned on the period within the aftermarket following the IPO. We attribute the results to different liquidity and information effects among the three periods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkins, Allen B., and Edward A. Dyl. 1990. “Price Reversals, Bid-Ask Spreads, and Market Efficiency.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25: 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, R.. 1989. “Collection of Information about Publicly Traded Firms: Theory and Evidence.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 11: 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Daniel J., Bradford D. Jordan, and Jay R. Ritter. 2003. “The Quiet Period Goes Out with a Bang.”Journal of Finance 58: 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, Daniel J., Bradford D. Jordan, Ivan C. Roten, and Ha-Chin Yi. 2001. “Venture Capital and IPO Lockup Expiration: An Empirical Analysis.”Journal of Financial Research 24: 465–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, Bruce C., Daryl M. Guffey, and Donald P. Pagach. 1998. “Announcements of Analyst Coverage.”Contemporary Accounting Research 15: 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brav, Alon, and Paul A. Gompers. 2000. “Insider Trading Subsequent to Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Expirations of Lock-Up Provisions.” Working paper. Duke University.

  • Bremer, Marc, and Richard J. Sweeney. 1991. “The Reversal of Large Stock-Price Decreases.”Journal of Finance 46: 747–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John Y., Sanford J. Grossman, and Jiang. Wang. 1993. “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 108: 905–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Charles, Laura C. Field, and Gordan Hanka. 2004. “Does Insider Trading Impair Market Liquidity? Evidence from IPO Lockup Expirations.”Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 39: 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wesley S.. 2003. “Stock Price Reaction to News and No-News: Drift and Reversal after Headlines.”Journal of Financial Economics 70: 223–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., S. Jarrell, and R. Kieschnick. 2001. “The Role of Asymmetric Information in U.S. IPO Cycles.” Working Paper. University at Texas at Dallas.

  • Cox, Don R., and David R. Peterson. 1994. “Stock Returns Following Large One-Day Declines: Evidence on Short-Term Reversals and Longer-Term Performance.”Journal of Finance 49: 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Kent, Daniel Hirshleifer, and Avanidhar Subrahmanyam. 1998. “Investor Psychology and Security Market Under-and Overreactions.”Journal of Finance 53: 1839–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, Werner F., and Richard H. Thaler. 1985. “Does the Stock Market Overreact?”Journal of Finance 40: 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draho, Jason. 2001. “The Coordinating Role of Public Information in Hot Market IPOs. Working paper. Yale University.

  • Easley, David, Nicholas M. Kiefer, Maureen O'Hara, and Joseph B. Paperman. 1996. “Liquidity, Information, and Infrequently Traded Stocks.”Journal of Finance 51: 1405–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehle, Frank, and Z. Zdorovtsov. 2002. “Large Price Declines, News, Liquidity and Trading Strategies: An Intraday Analysis.” Working paper. University of South Carolina.

  • Field, Laura C., and Gordon Hanka. 2001. “The Expiration of IPO Share Lockups.”Journal of Finance 56: 471–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Steven J., and Jeff. Madura. 2002. “What Drives Price Behavior Following Extreme One-Day Returns.”Journal of Financial Research 26: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Charles M., and Bhaskaran Swaminathan. 2000. “Price Momentum and Trading Volume.”Journal of Finance 55: 2017–2069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marietta-Westberg, J., and Tim Loughran. 2004. “When Any News is Bad News: Extreme Events Following an Initial Public Offering.”Review of Financial Studies. Forthcoming.

  • Mikkelson, Wayne H., and M. Megan Partch. 1988. “Withdrawn Security Offerings.”The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23: 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, Nancy J., and Carl R. Chen. 2001. “Information Content of Lock-Up Provisions in Initial Public Offerings.”Journal Review of Economics and Finance 10: 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, Tobias J., and Mark Grinblatt. 1999. “Do Industries Explain Momentum?Journal of Finance 54: 1249–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. 1990.Classical and Modern Regression with Applications. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Wiggenhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiggenhorn, J., Madura, J. Impact of liquidity and information on the mispricing of newly public firms. J Econ Finan 29, 203–220 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761554

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761554

Keywords

Navigation