Abstract
The Enron scandal offers the opportunity to assess the degree to which misleading accounting can affect connected firms and industry rivals. While the market was inept at detecting the inaccuracy of Enron’s financial statements, it swiftly punished many connected firms once Enron's faulty accounting was publicized. A cross-sectional analysis documents that the market punished connected firms that had greater exposure to Enron’s business, whose financial statements were viewed as more complex, and that had greater financial leverage. Most of the negative news indicating concern with Enron’s accounting corresponded with a significant decline in the stock prices of firms in the energy and natural gas (ENG) industry, regardless of an explicit connection to Enron. Furthermore, rival firms with direct exposure to Enron and more aggressive earnings-reporting methods also experienced more detrimental effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-khalik, A. Rashad. 2002. “Reforming Corporate Governance Post Enron: Shareholders' Board of Trustees and the Auditor.”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 97–103.
Aharony, Joseph, and Itzhak Swary. 1983. “Contagion Effects of Bank Failures: Evidence From Capital Markets”.Journal of Business 56: 305–322.
Aharony, Joseph, and Itzhak Swary. 1996. “Additional Evidence on the Information-Based Contagion Effects of Bank Failures”.Journal of Banking and Finance 20: 57–69.
Atiase, Rowland K. 1985. “Predisclosure Information, Firm Capitalization, and Security Price Behavior Around Earnings Announcements”.Journal of Accounting Research 23: 21–36.
Benston, George J., and Al L. Hartgraves. 2002 “Enron: What Happened and What We Can Learn from It”.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 105–127.
Bhargava, Rahul, and Donald R. Fraser. 1998. “On the Wealth and Risk Effects of Commerical Bank Expansion into Securities Underwriting: An Analysis of Section 20 Subsidiaries.”Journal of Banking and Finance 22: 447–465.
Bhattacharya, Utpal, Hazem Daouk, and Michael Welker. 2003. “The World Price of Earnings Opacity”.Accounting Review 78: 641–678.
Boehmer, Ekkehart, Jim Musumeci, and Annette B. Poulsen. 1991. “Event-Study Methodology Under Conditions of Event-Induced Variance”.Journal of Financial Economics 30: 253–272.
Chaney, Paul K., and Kirk L. Philipich. 2002. “Shredded Reputation: The Cost of Audit Failure.”Journal of Accounting Research 40: 1221–1245.
Demski, Joel S. 2002. “Enron et al.—A Comment”.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 129–130.
Erwin, Gayle R., and James M. Miller. 1998. “The Intra-Industry Effects of Open Market Share Repurchases: Contagion or Competitive?”Journal of Financial Research 21: 389–406.
Fenn, George W., and Rebel A. Cole. 1994. “Announcements of Asset-Quality Problems and Contagion Effects in the Life Insurance Industry”.Journal of Financial Economics 35: 181–198.
Gillan, Stuart L., and John D. Martin. 2002. “Financial Engineering, Corporate Governance, and the Collapse of Enron.”Working paper. University of Delaware.
Healy, Paul M., and Krishna G. Palepu. 2002. “Governance and Intermediation Problems in Capital Markets: Evidence from the Fall of Enron.”Working paper. Harvard University.
Johnston, J., 1984.Econometric methods. New York: McGraw Hill.
Lang, Larry H.P., and Rene M. Stulz. 1992. “Contagion and Competitive Intra-Industry Effects of Bankruptcy Announcements: An Empirical Analysis”.Journal of Financial Economics 32: 45–60.
Lev, Baruch. 2002. “Where Have All of Enron's Intangibles Gone?”Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 131–135.
Marquardt, Donald W., and Ronald D. Snee. 1975. “Ridge Regression in Practice”.American Statistician 29: 3–19.
Revsine, Lawrence. 2002. “Enron: Sad but Inevitable”.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 137–145.
Saunders, Anthony, and Michael Smirlock. 1987. “Intra- and Interindustry Effects of Bank Securities Market Activities: the Case of Discount Brokerage”.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22: 467–482.
Slovin, Myron B., Marie E. Sushka, and Yvette M. Bendeck. 1991. “The Intra-Industry Effects of Going-Private Transactions.”Journal of Finance 46: 1537–1549.
Song, Moon H., and Ralph A. Walkling. 2000. “Abnormal Returns to Rivals of Acquisition Targets: A Test of the ‘Acquisition Probability Hypothesis’”.Journal of Financial Economics 55: 143–171.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akhigbe, A., Madura, J. & Martin, A.D. Accounting contagion: The case of Enron. J Econ Finan 29, 187–202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761553
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761553