Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accreditation—what’s that?

Understanding the ncate/aect folio review process

  • Feature
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

So when that phone call comes from the Dean, don’t panic. Just remember that the curriculum folio is intended to be simple and straightforward—a compilation of information about your program. Please feel free to contact the committee if you require additional assistance in your accreditation efforts

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1971)Basic guidelines for media and technology in teacher education. Washington, DC: AECT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1974a) Guidelines for the certification of personnel in educational communications and technology.Audiovisual Instruction, 19(9), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1974b) AECT guidelines for advanced programs in educational communications and technology.Audiovisual Instruction, 19(9), 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1982)Basic guidelines for media and technology in teacher education and guidelines for the accreditation of advanced programs in educational communications and information technologies. Washington, DC: AECT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (1989)Guidelines for the accreditation of programs in educational communications and information technologies. Washington, DC: AECT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeson, C. O. (1973) Accreditation of educational media personnel: A developmental look.Audiovisual Instruction, 18(5), 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, W. F. and Bergeson, C. O. (1974) Accreditation and certification: A report.Audiovisual Instruction, 19(9), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grady, W. F. (1987) NCATE’s redesign and AECT’s guidelines for accreditation. InEducational Media and Technology Yearbook. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 113–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigge, W. C. (1974) Accreditation and certification: A frame of reference.Audiovisual Instruction, 19(9), 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. L. and Grady, W. F. (1982) AECT, NCATE, and accreditation of instructional technology. InEducational Media and Technology Yearbook. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited, 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media Arts, University of South Carolina, South Carolina

    Walter Hanclosky (professor, serve as Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, of the AECT/NCATE Accreditation Committee)

  2. Department of Educational Design and Management, University of North Carolina, Wilmington

    Rodney Earle (professor, serve as Chair and Vice Chair, respectively, of the AECT/NCATE Accreditation Committee)

Authors
  1. Walter Hanclosky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodney Earle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanclosky, W., Earle, R. Accreditation—what’s that?. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 37, 14–19 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761389

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761389

Keywords

Search

Navigation