Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early identification of neuro-developmental disorders

  • Symposium: Developmental Disorders
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brazelton B. Early intervention. What does it mean? In: Fitzgerald HE, Lester BM, Yogman MW, eds.Theory and Research in Behavioural Pediatrics. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1982: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Russman SB. Early intervention for the biologically handicapped infant and young child. Is it of value?Pediatrics Review 1983; 5: 2, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andre'-Thomas, Chesni Y., Saint-Anne Dargassies S.The Neurological Examination of the Infant. Little Club Clinics in Developmental Medicine, No. 1, London, Spastic Society 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saint-Anne Dargassies S.The Neuromotor and Psychoaffective. Development of the Infant. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frankenburg W, Dodds J. The Denver development screening test.Pediatr 1967; 71: 181–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Milani-Comparetti AM, Gidoni EA. Routine development examination in normal and retarded infants.Dev Med Child Neurol 1967; 9: 631–638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gesell G, Amatruda D.Developmental Diagnosis. 2nd edition, Maryland: Harper and Row. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dubowitz L, Dubowitz V. The neurological assessment of the preterm and full term newborn infant.Clinics in Developmental Medicine, Philadelphia: Lippincott. 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amiel-Tison C, Grenier A.Neurological Assessment During the First Year of Life. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones RAK, Cummins M, Davies PA. Infants of very low birth weight.Lancet 1979; 1: 1332–1335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vohr BR, Hack M. Developmental follow up of low birth weight infants.Ped Clin North Am 1982; 29: 1441–1448.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Horwood SP, Boyle MH, Torrance GW et al. Mortality and morbidity of 500 to 1,449 gram birth weight infants live born to residents of a defined geographic region before and after neonatal intensive care.Pediatrics 1982; 69: 613–620.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen SE, Sigman M, Parmalee AM et al. Perinatal risk and developmental outcome in preterm infants.Semin Perinatol 1982; 6: 334–339.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Siegel LS, Saigal S, Rosenbaum P et al. Predictors of development in preterm and full term infants; a model for detecting the at risk child.J Pediatr Psychol 1982; 7: 135–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel LS. Reproductive, perinatal and environmental variables as predictors of development of preterm (1500 grams) and full term children at five years.Semin Perinatol 1984; 6: 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Low JA, Galbraith RS, Muir DW et al. The contribution of fetal-newborn complications to motor and cognitive deficits.Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 578–587.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kitchen WH, Rickards AL, Ryan MM et al. Improved outcome of two years of very low birth weight infants: fact or artifact?Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 28: 579–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dubowitz LMS, Bydder GM, Mushin J. Developmental sequence of periventricular leukomalacia.Arch Dis Child 1985; 60: 349–355.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Low JA, Galbraith RS, Saurebrei EE et al. Motor and cognitive development of infants with intraventricular hemorrhage, ventriculomegaly, or periventricular parenchymal lesions.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155: 750–756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tudehope DI, Rogers YM, Burns YR et al. Apnoea in very low birth weight infants: Outcome at 2 years.Aust Pediatr J 1986; 22: 131–134.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allen MC. Developmental outcomes and follow up of the small for gestational age infant.Semin Perinatol 1984; 8: 123–156.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weindling AM, Rochefort MJ, Calvert SA et al. Development of cerebral palsy after ultrasonographic detection of periventricular cysts in the newborn.Dev Med Child Neurol 1985; 27: 880–806

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vohr BR, Oh W, Rosenfield AG et al. The preterm small for gestational age infant: a two year follow up study.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979; 133: 425–431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lipper E, Lee K, Gartner LM et al. Determinants of neurobehavioural outcome in low birth weight infants.Pediatrics 1981; 67: 502–505.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Commey JO, Fitzhardinge PM. Handicap in the preterm small for gestational age infant.J Pediatr 1979; 94: 779–786.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Apgar scores as predictors of chronic neurologic disability.Pediatrics 1981; 68: 36–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sykes GS, Johnson P, Asbworth F et al. Do Apgar scores indicate asphyxia?Lancet 1982; 1: 494–496.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Use and abuse of the Apgar score.Pediatrics 1986; 78: 1148–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Low JA, Galbraith RS, Muri DW et al. Factors associated with motor and cognitive deficits in children after intrapartum fetal hypoxia.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 533–539.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lipper EG, Voorhies TM, Ross G et al. Early predictors of one-year outcome infants asphyxiated at birth.Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 28: 303–309.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fitzhardinge PM, Kazemi M, Ransey M et al. Long term sequelae of neonatal meningitis.Dev Med Child Neurol 1974; 16: 3–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Edwards MS, Rench MA, Haffar AA et al. Long term sequelea of Group B streptococcal meningitis in infants.J Pediatr 1985; 106: 717–722.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Chin KC, Fizhardinge PM. Sequelae of early onset group B hemolytic streptococcal neonatal meningitis.J Pediatr 1985; 106: 819–822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wald ER, Bergman I, Taylor HG et al. Longterm outcome of group B streptococcal meningitis.Pediatrics 1986; 77: 217–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Koivisto MM, Blanco-Sequeiros M, Krause A. Neonatal symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemia: a follow up study of 157 children.Dev Med Child Neurol 1972; 14: 603–614.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Singh MB et al. Neonatal hypoglycemia: Neurodevelopmental outcome of asymptomatic versus symptomatic babies.Indian J Med Res. In Press.

  37. Illingworth RS. The diagnosis of cerebral palsy in the first year of life.Child Neurol 1965; 8: 178–194.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Taft LT: Cerebral palsy.Pediatric Review 1984; 6: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Burns YR, O' Callaghan M, Tudehope DI. Early identification of cerebral palsy in high risk infants.Aust Pediatr J 1989; 25: 215–219.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Radhika S, Singhi P, Walia BNS et al. Early developmental and psychoaffective predictors of cerebral palsy in high risk infants.Unpublished thesis data. PGIMER 1991.

  41. Aylward GP. Issues in prediction and developmental follow up.Dev Behav Pediatr 1988; 9: 307–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Siegel LS. Correction of prematurity and its consequences for the assessment of the very low brith weight infants.Child Dev 1983; 54: 1176–1188.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Miller G, Dubowitz LMS, Falmer P. Follow up of preterm infants. Is correction of the developmental quotient for prematurity helpful?Early Hum Dev 1984; 9: 137–144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Blasco PA. Preterm birth: to correct or not to correct.Dev Med Child Neurol 1989: 31: 816–826

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Amiel-Tison C, Stewart A. Follow up studies during the first five years of life: a pervative assessment of neurological function.Arch Dis Child 1989; 64: 496–502.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Cohen JH. Screening for developmental disabilities.Pediatrics 1983; 78: 3: 526–534.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Illingworth RS.An Introduction to Developmental Assessment in the First Year. Little Club Clinics in Developmental Medicine 3, London: Willian Heinemann, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Illingworth RS.The Development of the Infant and the Young Child: Normal and Abnormal. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Saint-Anne Dargassies S.The Neuromotor and Psycho Affective Development of the Infant. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishers. 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Illingworth RS. Pitfalls in developmental diagnosis.Arch Dis Child. 1987; 62: 860–865.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Touwen BC. Variability and sterotype of spontaneous motility as a predictor of neurological development of preterm infants.Dev Med Child Neurol 1990; 32: 501–508.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Gross SJ Ochper JM, Eckerman CO. Head growth and developmental outcome in VLBW infants.Pediatrics 1983; 71: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hack M Breslau N. VLBW infants: effects of brain growth during infancy on IQ at 3 years of age.Pediatrics 1986; 77 (2): 196–201.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. D'Souza SW, Gowland M, Richards B et al. Head size, brain growth and lateral ventricles in very low birth weight infants.Arch Dis Child 1986; 61: 1090–1095.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Prechti H FR, Farget JW, Weinmann RM, Baker HH. Positive mobility and respiration of low risk preterm infants.Dev Med Child Neurol 1979; 21: 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Milani Comparetti A. The neurophysiologic and clinical implications of studies on fetal motor behaviour.Semin Perinatol 1981; 5: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Robson P. Treatment of Cerebral Palsy. In: Alur M, ed.Its Ability that Counts. 1982, 16–24.

  58. Levitt S.Treatment of Cerebral Palsy and Motor Delay. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Johnson A, Ashurt H. Is popliteal angle measurement useful in early identification of cerebral palsy?Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 457–465.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Paine R, Cappe TE.Neurological Examination of Children. Clinics in Developmental Medicine. Spastics Society Medical Education. London: William Heinemann, 1966: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Donavan DE, Paine RS. Prognostic implications of neurologic abnormalities in the neonatal period.Neurology 1962: 12: 910–919.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hogan GR, Millingan JE. The plantar reflex of the newborn.N Engl J Med 1971; 285: 502–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Children who “outgrew” cerebral palsy.Pediatrics 1982; 69: 529–536.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Drillien CM. Abnormal neurologic signs in the first year of life in low birth weight infants. Possible prognostic significance.Dev Med Child Neurol 1972; 14: 575–584.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Rubin RA, Balow B. Infant neurological abnormalities as indicators of cognitive impairment.Dev Med Child Neurol 1980; 22: 336–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Vojta V. Die cerebralen Bewegungsstorungen in saughing salter. Fruhdiagnose and Fruhtherapie. F. Enke Verlag Stuttgart 1974. as quoted in Amiel Tison and Grenier A.Neurological Assessment During the First Year of Life. Oxfor, New York. Oxford University. Press 1986: 21.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Hall DB, Baired G. Developmental tests and scales.Arch Dis Child 1986; 61: 213–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ware J, Schnell RR. Cognitive assessment. In: Taeusch HW, Yogman MW, eds.Followup and Management of the High Risk Infant. Boston: Little Brown and Company 1987; 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Manual for using Abridged.Bayley Scales of Infant Development. (Research form 1961), Based on Baroda studies and Baroda norms. 1986, Department of child development, Faculty of Home Science, M.S. University of Baroda, India.

  70. Phatak P.Mental and motor growth of Indian babies, 1987 II edition. Department of Child Development, Faculty of Home Science, M.S. University of Baroda, India.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Chandler LS, Andrews MS, Swanson MW. Movement assessment of infants— A Manual. Rolling Bay, Washington, Chandler: Andrews and Swanson, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Nicke RE, Renken CA, Gallenstein JS. The infant motor screen.Dev Med Child Neurol 1989; 31: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Dworkin PH. Development screening-Expecting the impossible?Pediatric 1989; 83: (4): 619–621.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Meisels SJ. Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at risk?Pediatrics 1989; 83: 4: 578–585.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Knobloch H, Stevens G, Malone A et al. The validity of parental reporting of infant development.Pediatrics 1979; 63: 872–878.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sonnander K. Parental developmental assessment of 18 months old children. Reliability and predictive value.Dev Med Child Neurol 1987; 29: 351–362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. UNICEFDisability Information Kit. UNICEF, Nepal, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Dworkin PH. British and American recommendations for developmental monitoring: The role of surveillance.Pediatrics 1989; 84 (6): 1000–1010.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Phatak P.Mental and Motor Growth of Indian Babies (1–30 months). Final Report, Department of Child Development, MSU, Baroda, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Malin AJ.Nagpur Adaptation of Vineland Social Maturity Scale.—Manual, Child Guidance Centre, Nagpur, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Malin AJ.Malin's Intelligence Scale for Indian Children. Manual, Child Guidance Centre, Nagpur, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Phatak P. Revision and Extension of Phatak Draw- A—Man Scale for Indian Children of age groups 21/2 to 161/2 years.Psychol Stud 1984; 29: 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, 160 012, Chandigarh

    Pratibha D. Singhi

Authors
  1. Pratibha D. Singhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singhi, P.D. Early identification of neuro-developmental disorders. Indian J Pediatr 59, 61–71 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02760900

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02760900

Keywords

Search

Navigation