Skip to main content
Log in

Why isN *(1470) not observed in photoproduction experiments?

  • Published:
Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1969-1970)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. L. D. Roper:Phys. Rev. Lett.,12, 340 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Betourne, J. C. Bizot, J. Perez-y-Jorba, D. Treille andW. Schmidt:Phys. Rev.,172, 1343 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. F. A. Behrends, A. Donnachie andD. L. Weaver:Nucl. Phys.,4 B, 54 (1967)..

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. O. Barut:Phys. Lett.,26 B, 30 (1968).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Breit andE. Teller:Astrophys. Journ.,91, 215 (1940).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. O. Barut, D. Corrigan andH. Kleinert:Phys. Rev. Lett.,20, 167 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant AF-AFOSR-30-67.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barut, A.O., Nagylaki, T. Why isN *(1470) not observed in photoproduction experiments?. Lettere Nuovo Cimento (1969-1970) 4, 157–160 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02755402

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02755402

Keywords

Navigation