Skip to main content
Log in

Neonatal screening by mid-arm circumference

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One hundred and ninety-seven neonates were screened within 24 hours after birth by a tricolored mid-arm circumference (MAC) measuring tape with a borderline yellow-zone between 7.5 cm and 8.5 cm and two peripheral zones, red and green beyond 7.5 cm and 8.5 cm respectively. All of the neonates identified by red-zone had birth weight less than 1500 g. Majority (89.7%) of neonates identified by yellow-zone had birth weight between 1500 g and 2000 g, but only a small (10.3%) number of neonates had birth weight more than 2000 g. A very large proportion of neonates identified by green-zone had birth weight more than 2000 g (98.8% vs 1.2% weighed less than 2000 g at birth). The sensitivity and specificity of MAC critical limit 8.5 cm identifying neonate below 2000 g were 93.7% and 98.2% respectively. It was not worthy in this study to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the critical limit of 7.5 cm for MAC to identify neonates below 1500 g because of the very small sample size. But, this simple MAC measuring tape can be used by field worker for easy assessment of low birth weight neonates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh M.Care of the Newborn, 3rd edn. New Delhi: Sagar publication, 1985: pp 124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhargava SK, Sachdev HPS, Iyer PV et al. Current status of infant growth measurements in perinatal period in India.Acta Pediatr Scand (Suppl) 1985; 319: 103–110.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhargava SK, Ramji S, Kumar A et al. Midarm and chest circumference at birth and early mortality.Br Med J 1985; 291: 1671–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh M, Paul VK, Deorari AK et al. Simple tricolored measuring tape for identification of low birth weight babies by community health workers.Ann Trop Paediatr 1988; 8: 87–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neela J, Raman L, Balakrishna N et al. Usefulness of calf circumference as a measure for screening low birth weight infants.Indian Pediatr 1991; 28: 881–884.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kulkarni ML, Rehman M. Neonatal assessment beyond birth weight.Indian Pediatr 1991; 28: 929–931.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohan M, Chellani HK, Shiv Prasad SR et al. Intrauterine growth predictors.Indian Pediatr 1991; 28: 1299–1304.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JE, Park K.Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 12th edn. Jabalpur: M/s. Banarsidas Bhanot Publications, 1989: pp 110

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barman, C.R. Neonatal screening by mid-arm circumference. Indian J Pediatr 61, 89–91 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02753567

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02753567

Key words

Navigation