Skip to main content
Log in

Output variability and economic growth: The case of Australia

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper looks at the relationship between output variability and economic growth in Australia using the ARCH-M model. Quarterly data for growth rates of industrial production and of GDP are used for the analyses. However, the growth of GDP does not show any ARCH effects. The variability is found to be significantly negatively related to the growth rate of industrial production. Unlike Caporale and McKiernan (1998), our empirical results do not support Black's (1987) hypothesis, which is that there is a positive relationship between output variability and economic growth. Our results support the Keynesian position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernanke, Ben. 1983. “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, Fischer. 1987.Business Cycles and Equilibrium. New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, Tim 1986. “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity”.Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, Tony, and Barbara McKiernan. 1996. “The Relationship between Output Variability and Growth: Evidence from Post War UK Data”.Scottish Journal of Political Economy 43: 229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caporale, Tony, and Barbara McKiernan. 1998. “The Fischer Black Hypothesis: Some Time Series Evidence”Southern Economic Journal 64: 765–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Robert. 1982. “Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation”.Econometrica 50: 987–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, Robert F., David M. Lilien, and Russell P. Robins. 1987. “Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model”.Econometrica 55: 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The Role of Monetary Policy.”,American Economic Review, 58: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, Kevin B., and Gordon Tullock. 1989. “An Empirical Analysis of Cross-National Economic Growth, 1951–80”.Journal of Monetary Economics, 24: 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund. 2000.International Financial Statistics, CD-ROM Version, May.

  • Jarque, C. M., and Anil K. Bera. 1987. “A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals.”International Statistical Review, 55: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, John Maynard. 1936.The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank. 1944. “Diminishing Returns from Investment”.Journal of Political Economy, 52: 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, Roger C., and Philip G. Meguire. 1985. “Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth: Cross-Country Evidence”.Journal of Monetary Economics 16: 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, Denis, Peter C. B. Phillips, Peter Schmidt and Y. Shin. 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure Are We That Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root?”Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, G. M., and G. P. E. Box 1978. “On a Measure of Lack of Fit in Time Series Models”.Biometrika 65: 297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S., and In-Moo Kim. 1998.Unit Roots, Cointegration and Structural Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirman, Leonard J. 1971. “Uncertainty and Optimal Consumption Decisions”Econometrica 39: 179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabeya, Seiji, and Katsuto Tanaka. 1988. “Asymptotic Theory of a Test for the Constancy of Regression Coefficients Against the Random Walk Alternative”.Annals of Statistics 16: 218–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, Robert S. 1991. “Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment”Journal of Economic Literature 29: 1110–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, Gary, and Valerie Ramey. 1991. “Technology Commitment and the Cost of Economic Fluctuations”. NBER Working Paper No. 3755.

  • Ramsey, Frank. 1928. “A Mathematical Theory of Saving”.Economic Journal 38: 543–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, David. 1817.On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth”.Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, Agnar. 1970. “The Effect of Uncertainty on Saving Decisions”.Review of Economic Studies 37: 353–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934.The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1776.An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert M. 1956. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow, Robert M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”.Review of Economics and Statistics 39: 312–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight, Alan E. 1999. “UK Output Variability and Growth: Some Further Evidence”.Scottish Journal of Political Economy 46: 175–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Trevor W. 1956. “Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation”.Economic Record 32: 334–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodford, Michael. 1990. “Learning to Believe in Sunspots”.Econometrica 58: 277–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz, Victor, and Geoffrey H. Moore. 1986. “Major Changes in Cyclical Behavior”.In The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change, edited by Robert J. Gordon. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Macri.

Additional information

The authors thank the anonymous referee for helpful comments on an earlier draft of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macri, J., Sinha, D. Output variability and economic growth: The case of Australia. J Econ Finan 24, 275–282 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02752608

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02752608

Keywords

Navigation