Summary
This paper is intended to show that the Franck-Condon principle is erroneously formulated when expressed in terms of vertical electronic transitions which take place very rapidly in comparison with the period of molecular vibration. The fallacy lies in presupposing the possibility of a measurement that violates the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Our suggestion is that the correct enunciate is as follows: the square of the overlap integral of vibrational wave functions determines the relative intensity of the vibrational bands within an electronic spectrum.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Alonso andE. J. Finn:Foundamental University Physics, Vol. III:Quantum and Statistical Physics (Reading, Mass., 1969), p. 224.
A. J. Dekker:Solid State Physics (New York, N.Y., 1957), p. 366.
J. Franck:Trans. Faraday Soc.,21, 536 (1925).
E. U. Condon:Phys. Rev.,28, 1182 (1926).
E. U. Condon:Phys. Rev.,32, 858 (1928).
W. A. Dampier:A History of Science (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1948), p. 397.
G. Herzberg:Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (New York, N.Y., 1950), p. 199.
M. Born andR. Oppenheimer:Ann. Phys. (Leipzig),84, 457 (1927).
G. Herzberg:Molecular Bpectra and Molecular Structure (New York, N.Y., 1960), p. 148.
L. Landau andE. Lifchtz:Mécanique Quantique (Moscou, 1967), p. 183.
G. Herzberg:Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure (New York, N.Y., 1950), p. 20 and P. 407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bosi, L. The Franck-Condon principle: considerations on the correctness of its formulation. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 40, 369–372 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751872
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751872