Empirical evidence of error in pricing of favorites and longshots in greyhound racing
Sports bettors' success depends on the ability to accurately assess the true probability of outcomes. Successful racetrack bettors can realize returns better than the track take out. Historical empirical evidence shows the presence of favorite-longshot bias (FLB) in horse racing where bettors underbet favorites. Conversely, bettors overbet longshots. We tested for FLB bias in racing data from three greyhound racetracks. Our results show opposite behavior. We show bettors apparently underestimated for longshots, and overestimated for favorites, the true probability of winning. In 10 out of 14 grades bettors significantly overbet favorites, and underbet longshots in 8 out of 14.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Busche, K. 1994. “Efficient Market Results in an Asian Setting” inEfficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (Eds) D. Hausch, V. Lo, and W. T. Ziemba, Academic Press, New York, 615–616.Google Scholar
- Ottaviani, M. and P. M. Sorensen. 2005. “The Timing of Bets and the Favorite—Longshot Bias.” working paper, London Business School.Google Scholar
- Thaler, R. and W. T. Ziemba. 1988. “Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 161–174.Google Scholar