Journal of Economics and Finance

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 49–58 | Cite as

Empirical evidence of error in pricing of favorites and longshots in greyhound racing

  • Anil Gulati
  • Shekar Shetty


Sports bettors' success depends on the ability to accurately assess the true probability of outcomes. Successful racetrack bettors can realize returns better than the track take out. Historical empirical evidence shows the presence of favorite-longshot bias (FLB) in horse racing where bettors underbet favorites. Conversely, bettors overbet longshots. We tested for FLB bias in racing data from three greyhound racetracks. Our results show opposite behavior. We show bettors apparently underestimated for longshots, and overestimated for favorites, the true probability of winning. In 10 out of 14 grades bettors significantly overbet favorites, and underbet longshots in 8 out of 14.


True Probability Horse Racing Final Odds Recent Performance Additional Dollar 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ali, M. 1977. “Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors.”Journal of Political Economy 85: 805–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asch, P. and R. E. Quandt. 1990. “Risk Love.”Journal of Economic Education 21: 422–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Busche, K. and C. D. Hall 1988. “An Exception to the Risk Preference Anomaly.”Journal of Business 61: 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Busche, K. 1994. “Efficient Market Results in an Asian Setting” inEfficiency of Racetrack Betting Markets (Eds) D. Hausch, V. Lo, and W. T. Ziemba, Academic Press, New York, 615–616.Google Scholar
  5. Busche, K. and W. D. Walls. 2000. “Decision Costs and Betting Market Efficiency.”Rationality and Society 12: 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fama, E. F. 1991. “Efficient Capital Markets: II.”Journal of Finance 46: 1575–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Griffith, R. M. 1949. “Odds Adjustment by American Horse Race Bettors,”American Journal of Psychology 44: 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ottaviani, M. and P. M. Sorensen. 2005. “The Timing of Bets and the Favorite—Longshot Bias.” working paper, London Business School.Google Scholar
  9. Snyder, W. W. 1978. “Horse Racing: Testing the Market Efficiency Model.”The Journal of Finance 4: 1109–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Thaler, R. and W. T. Ziemba. 1988. “Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 2: 161–174.Google Scholar
  11. Walls, W. D., and K. Busche. 2003. “Broken Odds and the Favorite-Longshot Bias in Pari-Mutuel Betting: A Direct Test.”Applied Economic Letters 10: 311–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Salisbury UniversitySalisbury

Personalised recommendations