Skip to main content
Log in

The utility of urgent abdominal computed tomography in the elderly patient

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of urgent abdominal computed tomography (CT) performed in a nontrauma setting on a predominantly elderly population. We retrospectively reviewed abdominal CT images of 170 patients (average age, 64 years); CT was performed on a “stat” basis to evaluate suspected acute abdominal pathology at a typical urban Veterans’ Affairs hospital. Imaging results were correlated with subsequent clinical intervention.

Abdominal CT was most commonly ordered to assess abdominal pain (119 cases, 71%), suspected abdominal abscess (11 cases, 6.5%), suspected leaking abdominal aortic aneurysm (11 cases, 6.5%), and suspected acute pancreatitis (8 cases, 5%). Clinically relevant findings were recorded in 96 abdominal CT cases (56%), only 23 (13.5%) of which depicted acute pathology. This included nine patients with abscesses, four with diverticulitis, two with nonspecific enteric inflammation, and two with cholecystitis. Only 16 patients (9%) required urgent therapy. The most common clinically relevant findings not requiring prompt intervention were cholelithiasis (11 cases), chronic pancreatitis (9 cases), and liver metastases (6 cases). Of 13 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm diagnosed on abdominal CT, 11 presented with abdominal pain, but none showed signs of rupture. Although, in a predominantly elderly population, urgent abdominal CT often reveals significant chronic disease, it seldom depicts pathology requiring prompt therapy. Therefore, a more focused use of this examination is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brasel KJ, Borgstrom DC, Kolewe KA, Weigelt JA. Abdominal computed tomography scan as a screening tool in blunt trauma. Surgery 1996;120:780–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Toosie A, Chang L, Renslo R, Artnell T, Bongard R, Stabile BE, et al. Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 1997;63:904–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sansom H, Seddon B, Padley SP. Clinical utility of abdominal CT scanning in patients with HIV disease. Clin Radiol 1997;52:698–703.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taourel P, Pradel J, Fabre JM, Cover S, Seneterre E, Bruel JM. Role of CT in the acute nontraumatic abdomen. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1995;16:151–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Richards JR, Derlet RW. Computed tomography and blunt abdominal injury: patient selection based on examination, hematocrit and hematuria. Injury 1997;28:181–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill BD, Jenkins JR. Cost-effective evaluation and management of the acute abdomen. Surg Clin North Am 1996;76:71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried AM, Humphries R, Schofield CN. Abdominal CT scans in patients with blunt trauma: low yield in the absence of clinical findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;165:717–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, J.A., Abu-Judeh, H. & Ahmad, I. The utility of urgent abdominal computed tomography in the elderly patient. Emergency Radiology 5, 364–367 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749181

Key Words

Navigation