Skip to main content
Log in

Maternal risk factors in intrauterine malnutrition

  • Symposium: Nutrition
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Maternal risk factors in intrauterine malnutrition (IUM) were evaluated for their sensitivity and cut-off points for IUM were assessed for functional status. It was observed that the maternal weight and weight/height2 were the most sensitive indicators of IUM, while during pregnancy poor weight gain (<6·0 kg) contributed to almost 60% of IUM. Assessment of biochemical parameters like maternal blood glucose improved the sensitivity of identification of IUM. Based on morbidity, immune response and leucocyte metabolites, it was observed that cut-off point of 2·5 kg for term infants or 10 percentile of expected weight at any time of pregnancy is a fairly good indicator of IUM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metcoff J, Costiloe P, Crosby WM, Bentle L, Dutta S, Weaver F, Burns G. Predicting fetal growth from nutritional status of the mother at mid pregnancy.Baroda J Nutr 1982;9: 34–45

    Google Scholar 

  2. Habicht JP, Yarbrough C. Efficiency in selecting pregnant women for food sypplementation during pregnancy. In: Aebih and White Head R eds.Maternal nutrition during pregnancy and lactation. Nestle foundation publication series No. 1. 1980; 314–336.

  3. Raman L. In: Menon, Devi and Rao eds.Nutrition in pregnancy and lactation. Postgraduate obstetrics and gynaecology Madras: Orient Longman Publishers 1981; 28–37

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh S, Bhargava SK, Bhargava V. Growth pattern in the first year.Indian Pediatr 1970;7: 374–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta A, Jayant K. Perinatal mortality survey in India (1977–79) Part I—Identification of health intervention.J Obstet Gynaecol India 1981;31: 2, 183–215

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomson AM, Billewicz WZ, Hytten FE. The assessment of fetal growth.J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commons 1968;75: 903–916

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Singer JE, Westphal M, Niswander K. Relationship of weight gain during pregnancy to birth weight and infant growth and development in the first year of life.Obstet Gynecol 1968; 31: 3, 417–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lechtig A, Delgado H, Lasky RE, Engle PL, Yarbrough C, Habicht JP. Maternal nutrition and fetal growth in developing societies.Am J Dis Child 1975;129: 434–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Metcoff J, Costiloe P, Crosby W. Selection of pregnant women likely to have malnourished babies.Baroda J Nutr 1982;9: 341–347

    Google Scholar 

  10. Visweswara Rao K. Efficiency of anthropometric indices for the diagnosis of malnutrition.Courrier 1980;30: 113–121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hytten FE, Leitch I.Weight gain in pregnancy. The physiology of human pregnancy; Black-well Scientific Publishers 1971; 279–285

  12. Eastman NJ, Jackson E. Weight relationship in pregnancy with the bearing of maternal weight gain and prepregnancy weight of birth weight in full term pregnancies.Obstet Gynaecol Survey 1968;23: 1003–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomson AM, Billewicz WZ. Clinical significance of weight trends during pregnancy.Br Med J 1957;1: 243–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Metcoff J. Biochemical markers of intrauterine malnutrition In: M. Winick ed.Nutrition and fetal development, New York: John Widey and sons, 1974; 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  15. Menon MKK. Anemia in pregnancy.Proc Nutr Soc India 1968;2: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raman L. Anemia in prenancy. In: Menon, Devi and Rao eds.Postgraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology Madras: Orient Longman Publishers 1981; 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prema K, Neelakumari S, Ramalaxmi BA. Anemia and adverse obstetric outcome.Nutr Rep Int 1981;23: 637–643

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raman L, Rao VA, Kumar S. Influence of maternal levels of glucose on fetal outcome.Int J Gynecol Obstet 1981;20: 363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Venkatachalam PS. Maternal nutritional status and its effect on the new born.Bull WHO 1962;26: 193–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Long PA, Abell DA, Beischer NA. Fetal growth retardation and preeclampsia.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1980;87: 13–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iyengar LR. Evaluation of biochemical profile in mothers in assessing intrauterine growth.Baroda J Nutr 1982;9: 46–51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Annual Report, National Institute of Nutrition, ICMR, Hyderabad 1975; 123–124

  23. Bhaskaram P, Raghuramulu N, Reddy V. Cell mediated immunity and immunoglobulin levels in light-for-date infants.Acta Peditr Scand 1977;66: 617–619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chandra RK. Fetal malnutrition and postnatal immunocompetence.Am J Dis Child 1975;129: 450–454

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iyengar LR, Viswanathan MK. Leucocyte metabolism in maternal and cord blood in intrauterine malnutrition (IUM).Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1983;21: 217–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raman, L. Maternal risk factors in intrauterine malnutrition. Indian J Pediatr 54, 503–510 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02749043

Key words

Navigation