This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
R. M. Edelstein, R. A. Carrigan jr.,N. C. Hien, T. J. McMahon, I. Nadelhaft, E. W. Anderson, E. J. Bleser, G. B. Collins, T. Fujii, J. Menes andF. Turkot:Phys. Rev. D,5, 1073 (1972);J. V. Allaby, A. N. Diddens, R. W. Dobinson, A. Klovning, J. Litt, L. S. Rochester, K. Schlüpmann, A. M. Wetherell, U. Amaldi, R. Biancastelli, C. Bosio andG. Matthiae:Nucl. Phys.,52 B, 316 (1973).
Although this fact has not (to the author’s knowledge) been publicized before, it has apparently been noted by some diffractive phenomenologists:J. Kasman: private communication.
Reasonable variations ins 0, or the use of mass factors as appear in cos\(\theta \iota \), do not alter our conclusions significantly.
For slopes for pp→p+M.M. at ISR see Fig. 3b) inM. G. Albrow, D. P. Barber, A. Bogaerts, B. Bošnjaković, J. R. Brooks, A. B. Clegg, F. C. Erné, C. N. P. Gee, A. D. Kanaris, D. H. Locke, F. K. Loebinger, P. G. Murphy, A. Rudge, J. C. Sens, K. Terwilliger andF. van der Veen:Nucl. Phys.,51 B, 388 (1973).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teper, M. Evidence against diffractive factorization. Lett. Nuovo Cimento 7, 180–182 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02746354
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02746354