Abstract
The variation of yield strength and fracture toughness was investigated for four different heat treatments attempted on specimens of a near-eutectoid steel. The aim of this study was to optimize the microstructure for simultaneous improvements in strength and toughness. Further, the fracture toughness deduced through empirical relations from tensile and charpy impact tests was compared with those measured directly according to ASTM Designation: E 399. Among the four different heat treatments attempted in this study, the plane strain condition was valid in the fracture toughness tests for (i) normalized and (ii) hardened and tempered (500°C for 1 h) treatments only. The latter of the two heat treatments resulted in simultaneous improvement of strength and plane strain fracture toughness. The finely-dispersed carbides seem to arrest the crack propagation and also increase the strength. The pearlitic microstructure of the former leads to easy crack propagation along cementite platelets and/or cementite/ferrite interfaces. The nature of variation of empirically determined toughness values from tensile tests for different heat treatments is similar to that measured directly through fracture toughness tests, although the two sets of values do not match quantitatively. On the other hand, the toughness data deduced from charpy impact test is in close agreement with that evaluated directly from fracture toughness tests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Curry D A and Knott J F 1978Metal Sci. 8 511
Hahn G T and Rosenfield A R 1968ASTM STP 432 5
Porter D A, Easterling K E and Smith G D W 1978Acta Metall. 26 1405
Provan J W 1988J. Mater. Edu. 10 325
Rama Rao P 1978Trans. Indian Inst. Metals 31 239
Rolfe S T and Novak S R 1970ASTM STP 463 124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sudhakar, K.V., Murty, G.S. Fracture toughness correlation with microstructure and other mechanical properties in near-eutectoid steel. Bull Mater Sci 21, 241–245 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744976
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744976