Skip to main content
Log in

The need to step up the gonadotropin dosage in the stimulation phase of IVF treatment predicts a poor outcome

  • Clinical Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is a common practice to increase the gonadotropin dose during ovarian stimulation when the estradiol (E2) rise is found to be inadequate. The prognostic impact of the use of this step-up regimen on the outcome of the affected in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle is the subject of this study.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of IVF cycles in a series of consecutive patients who required an increase in the gonadotropin dosage during the stimulation phase because of inadequate E2 rise. Controls consisted of patients in whom the dose was not increased. After 4 days of stimulation, the gonadotropin dosage was increased if E2 levels failed to rise by 70% every 2 days. Outcome was defined in terms of maximum E2 level, number of follicles at aspiration, number of oocytes obtained, fertility rate, and pregnancy rate and was compared in study and control patients. Pregnancy was defined by sonographic demonstration of cardiovascular activity.

Results

One hundred forty-five patients were analyzed. A stepup regimen was used in 35 patients (24.1%). Patients who required the step-up dosing had significantly lower peak E2 levels (1373 vs 1828 pg/ml; P < 0.005), fewer follicles measuring greater than 16 mm (7.2 vs 9.7; P < 0.003), and fewer oocytes recovered (8.3 vs 11.2; P < 0.009). The fertilization rate (67.6 vs 64.2%) was not significantly different. The pregnancy rate (8.5 vs 32.7%; P < 0.004) was significantly lower in the group requiring the stepup regimen.

Conclusions

The utilization of a step-up regimen during an IVF treatment cycle is a predictor of a poor outcome for the specific IVF cycle. As this information is available before retrieval, consideration of cycle cancellation may be appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Hooff MHA, Alberda AT, Huisman GJ, Zeilmaker GH, Leerentveld RA: Doubling the human menopausal gonadotrophin dose in the course of an in-vitro fertilization treatment cycle in low responders: A randomized study. Hum Reprod 1993:8:369–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stadtmauer L, Ditkoff EC, Session D, Kelly A: High dosages of gonadotropins are associated with poor pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1994:61:1058–1064

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Durrelman S, Simon R: Flexible regression models with cubic splines. Stat Med 1989:8:551–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Beauchamp PJ: Human menopausal gonadotropin for follicular recruitment in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer.In Human In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, DP Wolf, MM Quigley (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1984, p 99

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sato F, Marrs RP: Effect of ovarian hyperstimulation on chromosome aberration and sister chromatid exchange on in vivo fertilized oocytes. Fertil Steril 1984:41:245–247

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simon T, Oehninger S, Toner J, Jones D, Muasher S: High doses of gonadotropins have no detrimental effect on in vitro fertilization outcome in normal responders. Fertil Steril 1995:63:1333–1336

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Manzi DL, Thorton KL, Scott LB, Nulsen JC: The value of increasing the dose of human menopausal gonadotropins in women who initially demonstrate a poor response. Fertil Steril 1994;62:251–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Land JA, Yarmolinskaya MI, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH: Highdose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve IVF outcome. Fertil Steril 1996;65:961–965

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Padilla SL, Dugan K, Maruschak V, Shalika S, Smith RD: Use of the flare-up protocol with high dose human follicle stimulation hormone and human menopausal gonadotropins for in vitro fertilization in poor responders. Fertil Steril 1996, 65:796–799

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Antoine JM: Which stimulation for poor responders? Critical study of results and methods of research. Contracept Fertil Sex 1996;24:386–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindheim SR, Barad DH, Witt B, Ditkoff E, Sauer MV: Shortterm gonadotropin suppression with oral contraceptives benefits poor responders prior to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. J Assist Roprod Genet 1996; 13:745–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hock, D.L., Louie, H., Shelden, R.M. et al. The need to step up the gonadotropin dosage in the stimulation phase of IVF treatment predicts a poor outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 15, 427–430 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744936

Key words

Navigation