Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Price dynamics when there are alternatives to cash payment

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical evidence from the 1980s and 1990s indicates that cash use in the U.S. remains high even though there has been a proliferation of alternatives to cash. This paper examines the dynamics of inflation and asset prices in response to innovations in the efficiency of processing noncash transactions. The quantitative results suggest that inflation is more sensitive than nominal interest rates or real equity prices to innovations in the efficiency of non-cash payments processing. Thus, as alternatives to cash payment become more prominent, the volatility of real interest rates may increase.(JELE31, E41, G12)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, John Y., and John H. Cochrane. 1999. “By Force of Habit: A Consumption-Based Explanation of U.S. Stock Market Behavior.”Journal of Political Economy 107: 205–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, Stephen, P. S. Lam, and Nelson Mark 1993. “The Equity Premium and the Risk Free Rate: Matching the Moments.”Journal of Monetary Economics 31: 55–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, Lawrence J. 1994. “Modelling the Liquidity Effect of a Money Shock.” InInventory, Business Cycles, and Monetary Transmission, edited by Riccardo Fiorito: 61–124. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, John H. 1999. “Money as Stock: Price Level Determination with no Money Demand.” University of Chicago working paper.

  • Constantinides, George M. 1990. “Habit Formation: A Solution of the Equity Premium Puzzle.”Journal of Political Economy 98: 519–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Diana, David B. Humphrey, and James A. Wilcox. 1999. “Cost Reductions in Electronic Payments: The Roles of Consolidation, Economics of Scale, and Technical Change.”Journal of Banking and Finance 23: 391–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, Diana, and David B. Humphrey. 1998. “Payments Transactions, Instruments, and Systems: A Survey.”Journal of Banking and Finance 21: 1573–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick, Robert J, Narayana Kocherlakota, and Deborah Lucas. 1991. “The Variability of Velocity in Cash in Advance Models.”Journal of Political Economy 99: 358–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, Peter N. 1995. “Endogenous Financial Intermediation and the Demand for Money.”Joural of Money, Credit, and Banking 27: 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, Philip N. 2000. “Home Base and Monetary Base Rules: Elementary Evidence from the 1980s and 1990s.”Journal of Economics and Business 52: 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1998. “Seigniorage Payments for Use of the Dollar: 1977–1995.”Economics Letters 58: 225–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Robert G., and Charles I. Plosser. 1984. “Money, Credit, and Prices in a Real Business Cycle.”American Economic Review 74: 363–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocherlakota, Narayana. 1996. “The Equity Premium: It’s Still a Puzzle.”Journal of Economic Literature 34: 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacker, Jeffrey M., and Stacey L. Schreft. 1996. “Money and Credit as Means of Payment.”Journal of Monetary Economics 38: 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Nancy L. Stokey. 1983. “Optimal Fiscal and Monetary Policy in an Economy without Capital.”Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 5–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, Rajnish, and Edward Prescott. 1985. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.”Journal of Monetary Economics 15: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Richard D., and Gretchen C. Weinbach. 1999. “Currency Ratios and U.S. Underground Economic Activity.”Economics Letters 63: 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Richard D., and Ruth A. Judson. 1996. “The Location of U.S. Currency: How Much is Abroad?”Federal Reserve Bulletin 82: 883–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkman, Jose A. 1980. “Discussion.” InModels of Monetary Economies, edited by J. Kareken and N. Wallace. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Lars E.O. 1985. “Money and Asset Prices in a Cash-in-Advance Economy.”Journal of Political Economy 93: 919–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Robert M. 1987. “Asset-Return Anomalies in a Monetary Economy.”Journal of Economic Theory 41: 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Carl E. 1998,Monetary Theory and Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Department, Swarthmore College, 19081, Swarthmore, PA

    Philip N. Jefferson

Authors
  1. Philip N. Jefferson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research is supported by a Swarthmore College Faculty Research Grant and a Eugene M. Lang Faculty Fellowship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jefferson, P.N. Price dynamics when there are alternatives to cash payment. J Econ Finan 25, 149–171 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744519

Keywords

Search

Navigation