Sadhana

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 577–595 | Cite as

Role of elasto-plastic analysis under cyclic loading in fatigue crack growth studies

Special Issue On Computational Structural Mechanics

Abstract

Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM) has been widely used in the past for fatigue crack growth studies, but this is acceptable only in situations which are within small scale yielding (SSY). In many practical structural components, conditions of SSY could be violated and one has to look for fracture criteria based on elasto-plastic analysis. Crack closure phenomenon, one of the most striking discoveries based on inelastic deformations during crack growth, has significant effect on fatigue crack growth rate. Numerical simulation of this phenomenon is computationally intensive and involved but has been successfully implemented. Stress intensity factors and strain energy release rates lose their meaning,J-integral (or its incremental) values are applicable only in specific situations, whereas alternate path independent integrals have been proposed in the literature for use with elasto-plastic fracture mechanics (EPFM) based criteria. This paper presents certain salient features of two independent finite element (numerical) studies of relevance to fatigue crack growth, where elasto-plastic analysis becomes significant. These problems can only be handled in the current day computational environment, and would have been only a dream just a few years ago.

Keywords

Fatigue crack growth material nonlinearity finite element analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atluri S N, Nishioka T l 1982 Incremental path-independent integrals in inelastic and dynamic fracture mechanics.Eng. Fract. Mech. 10: 209–244Google Scholar
  2. Blom A F, Holm D K 1985 An experimental and numerical study of crack closure.Eng. Fract. Mech. 22: 997–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broek D 1978Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sijthoff and Noordhoff)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Brombolich L J 1973 Elastic-plastic analysis of stresses near fastener holes. AIAA paper 73-252, 11th Aerospace Sciences meeting, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Brust F W, Nishioka T, Atluri S N 1985 Further studies on elasto-plastic stable fracture utilizing theT* integral.Eng. Fract. Mech. 22: 1079–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chermahini R G, Shivakumar K N, Newman J C 1988 Three-dimensional finite element simulation of fatigue crack growth and closure. ASTM STP 982, pp 398–413Google Scholar
  7. Dowling N E 1977 Crack growth during low-cycle fatigue of smooth axial specimens. ASTM STP 637, pp 97–121Google Scholar
  8. Elber W 1970 Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension.Eng. Fract. Mech. 2: 37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forman R G, Kerrney V E, Engle R M 1967 Numerical analysis of crack propagation under cyclic loaded structures.J. Basic Eng. 89: 459–464Google Scholar
  10. Hutchinson J W 1968 Singularity behavior at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material.J. Mech. Phys. Solids 16: 13–31MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hutchinson J W, Paris P C 1979 Stability analysis ofJ-controlled crack growth. ASTM STP 668, pp 37–64Google Scholar
  12. Lalor P L, Sehitoglu H 1988 Fatigue crack closure outside small scale yielding regime. ASTM STP 982, pp 342–360Google Scholar
  13. McClung R C, Sehitoglu H 1989 On the finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure-1, basic modeling issues -2, Numerical results. J. Eng. Fract. Mech. 33: 237–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakagaki M, Atluri S N 1980 Elastic-plastic analysis of fatigue crack closure in Mode I and II. AIAA J. 18: 1110–1117Google Scholar
  15. Nakagaki M, Chan W H, Atluri S N 1979 A finite element analysis of stable crack growth. ASTM STP 668, pp 195–213Google Scholar
  16. Newman J C Jr 1976 A finite element analysis of fatigue crack closure. ASTM STP 590, pp 281–301Google Scholar
  17. Newman J C Jr, Armen H Jr 1975 Elasto-plastic analysis of a propagating crack under cyclic loading.AIAA J. 13: 1017–1023MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogura K, Ojhi K 1977 FEM analysis of crack closure and delay effects in fatigue crack growth under variable amplitude loading.Eng. Fract. Mech. 9: 471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paris P C, Gomez M P, Anderson W E 1961Trends Eng. 13: 9–14Google Scholar
  20. Prager W 1955 The theory of plasticity. A survey of recent achievements.Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. 169: 41MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Rice J R 1968 A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks.J. Appl. Mech. 35: 379–386Google Scholar
  22. Rice J R, Rosengren G F 1968 Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power law hardening material.J. Mech. Phys. Solids 16: 1–12MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Satish Chander, Prathap G 1989 A field consistent formulation for eight-noded solid finite elements.Comput. Struct. 33: 345–355MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Satish Kumar K, Dattaguru B, Ramamurthy T S, Raju K N 1994 An algorithm for elastic-plastic contact stress analysis of interference fit pin joints.Int. J. Eng. Anal. Design 2: 71–82Google Scholar
  25. Satish Kumar K, Dattaguru B, Ramamurthy T S, Prakash R V, Raju K N 1995 Presented at 27th National symposium on fatigue and fracture mechanics, Stress intensity estimation for pin loaded lug joints under elastic and inelastic loading. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM), Williamsburg, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  26. Seshadri B R 1995Numerical simulation and experimental correlation of crack closure phenomenon under cyclic loading. Ph D thesis, Indian Institute of Science, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  27. Shih C F, Hutchinson J W 1976 Fully plastic solutions and large scale yielding estimates for plane stress crack problems.J. Eng. Mater. Tech. H98: 289–295Google Scholar
  28. Sunder R, Dash P K 1982 Measurement of fatigue crack closure through electron microscopy.Int. J. Fatigue 4: 97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wells A A 1962 Unstable crack propogation in metals: Damage and fast fracture.Proc of crack propagation symposium (London; College of Aeronautics) 1: 210–230Google Scholar
  30. Ziegler H 1967 A modification of Prager’s hardening rule.Q. Appl. Math. 17: 55–65MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. Zienkiewicz O C, Valliappan S, King I P 1969 Elasto-plastic solutions of engineering problems ‘initial stress’ finite element approach.Int. J. Numer. Methods in Eng. 1: 75–100MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Aerospace EngineeringIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations