Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The complementarity of quantum observables: Theory and experiments

  • Published:
La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento (1978-1999) Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. According to Wolfgang Pauli, the new quantum theory could have been called the theory of complementarity. (Pauli W.,General Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin) 1980, original German edition: 1933). This is one example showing the central importance of the notion of complementarity in the discussions on the foundations of quantum mechanics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Grangier Ph., Roger G. andAspect A.,Europhys. Lett.,1 (1986) 173;Aspect A. andGrangier Ph.,Hyperfine Interactions,37 (1987) 3; in:Sixty-Two Years of Uncertainty: Historical, Philosophical and Physical Inquiries into the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, edited byA. I. Miller (Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.) 1990, p. 45.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. This approach is discussed in a greter detail, for instance, in the monograph byBusch P., Grabowski M. andLahti P. J.,Operational Quantum Physics, Lect. Notes Phys., m.31 (Springer, Berlin) 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a more detailed presentation of measurement theory the reader may wish to consult the monograph byBusch P., Lahti P. J. andMittelstaedt P.,The Quantum Theory of Measurement, Lect. Notes Phys., m.2 (Springer, Berlin) 1991, second revised edition, 1995 (in press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. von Neumann J.,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin) 1981, original edition: 1932.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ludwig G.,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Springer, Berlin) 1983.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Davies E. B. andLewis J. T.,Commun. Math. Phys.,17 (1970) 239. See alsoLahti P. J., inRecent Development in Quantum Logic, edited byP. Mittelstaedt andE.-W. Stachow (Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim) 1985, p. 61.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bohr N.,Nature (1928) 580;Phys. Rev.,48 (1935) 696.

    Google Scholar 

  9. We recall that for two bounded self-adjoint operatorsA andB the orderingA ≤ B is defined as 〈φ|Aφ〉≤ 〈φ|Bφ〉 for all φ ∃ 27–01.

  10. For two bounded positive operatorsA, B the greatest lower bound may or may not exist among the positive operators. If it does exist it is denotedA ∧B.

  11. Kraus K.,Phys. Rev. D,10 (1987) 3070.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. For pairs of state transformations Φ1, Φ2 the ordering Φ1 ≤ Φ2 is defined as Φ1(T)≤ ≤ Φ2(T) for all statesT. If for two state transformations Φ1, Φ2 the greatest lower bound exists it is denoted Φ1 ∧ Φ2

  13. Busch P. andLahti P. J.,Phys. Rev. D,29 (1984) 1634.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garrison J. C. andWong J.,J. Math. Phys.,11 (1970) 2242.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenard A.,J. Funct. Anal.,10 (1972) 410.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Lahti P. J. andYlinen K.,J. Math. Phys.,28 (1987) 2614.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Busch P. andLahti P. J.,Phys. Lett. A,115 (1986) 259.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ylinen K.,J. Math. Anal. Appl.,137 (1989) 185.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Heisenberg W.,Z. Phys.,43 (1927) 172.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Busch P.,Int. J. Theor. Phys.,24 (1985) 63.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Davies E. B.,Quantum Theory of Open Systems (Academic Press, New York, N.Y.) 1976;Prugovečki E.,Stochastic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Spacetime (Reidel, Dordrecht) 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Busch P.,Phys. Rev. D,33 (1986) 2253.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mlak W.,Hilbert Spaces and Operator Theory (Kluwer, Dordrecht) 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Busch P.,J. Math. Phys.,25 (1984) 1794.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Busch P., Grabowski M. andLahti P. J.,Ann. Phys. (N.Y.),237 (1995) 1.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad S., Scully M. O. andMartienssen W.,Opt. Commun.,62 (1987) 139;Campos R. A., Saleh B. E. A. andTeich M. C.,Phys. Rev. A,40 (1989) 1371.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Perelomov A. M.,Generalized Coherent States and their Applications (Springer, Berlin) 1986.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Mittelstaedt P., Prieur A. andSchieder R.,Found. Phys.,17 (1987) 893.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sanders B. C. andMilburn G. J.,Phys. Rev. A,39 (1989) 694.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Busch P.,Found. Phys.,17 (1987) 905.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, Hull, UK

    P. Busch

  2. Department of Physics, University of Turku, 20500, Turku, Finland

    P. J. Lahti

Authors
  1. P. Busch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. J. Lahti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Busch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Busch, P., Lahti, P.J. The complementarity of quantum observables: Theory and experiments. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 18, 1–27 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743814

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02743814

Search

Navigation