Abstract
The current lack of a working resource management plan Magdalena Bay (southern Baja California, Mexico) has weakened attempts to set priorities among resource users and has contributed to: reduced fish stocks, land and marine contamination, and declines in the ecological integrity of the bay of 170 000 ha and its vast mangrove lagoon systems. The government agencies responsible for maintaining ecological integrity and managing marine resource use have not been successful in addressing these problems due to jurisdictional ambiguities, lack of community support, and lack of manpower for monitoring and enforcing policies. A framework was designed by the authors to work toward an approach for balancing between community development and conserving ecological integrity at the local level in the peripheral and central zones of the Magdalena Bay system. The goal of this framework was to suggest a basis for setting management priorities that included the perceptions and preferences of stakeholder groups with regard to direct threats to the environmental health of the study areas. To achieve this goal a crossdisciplinary study of the central and peripheral zones was used to examine factors that influence current resource use and the environmental state in these two regions of the bay system. Insights into the preferences and perceptions of stakeholder groups with regard to management priorities were acquired using the key informant technique. The results revealed potential conflicts with regard to preferred management priorities between stakeholder groups, as well as polarities within stakeholder groups themselves.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anon. 1982.Ley general de bienes nacionales. Diario Oficial, Viernes 8 de Enero de 1982, Secretaría de Obras Publicas y Asentamientos Humanos, México.
Anon. (SEDUE) 1988.Manual de ordenamiento ecológico del territorio. Secretaría de Desarollo Urbano y Ecología, México.
Anon. (SEMARNAP) 1992. Ley general del equílibrio ecológico y la protección al ambiente de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. In: Porrua, S.A. (ed.)Leyes y códigos de México. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, México.
Anon. (SEMARNAP) 1996.Programa de areas naturales protegidas de México, 1995–2000. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, México.
Agardy, T. 1993. Accommodating ecotourism in multiple use planning of coastal and marine protected areas.Ocean Coastal Manage, 20: 219–239.
Amante-Helmeg, V. 1996. Ecotourist beliefs and knowledge about dolphins and the development of Cetacean ecotourism.Aquat. Mamm. 22: 131–140.
Bromley, D. W. 1995. Property rights and natural resource damage assessment.Ecol. Econ. 14: 129–135.
Cendrero, A., 1989. Mapping and evaluation of coastal areas for planning.Ocean Shoreline Manage, 12: 427–462.
Cendrero, A & Charlier, R.M. 1980. Resources, land-use and management of the coastal fringe.Geolis 3: 40–50.
Cendrero, A. & Fischer, D. 1997. A procedure for assessing the environmental quality of coastal areas for planning and management.J. Coastal Res. 13: 732–744.
Cician-Sain, B. & Knecht, R. 1998.Integrated coastal and ocean management: Concepts and practices Island Press, Washington, DC.
Ciriacy-Wantrup, S.V. & Bishop, R.C. 1975: ‘Common Property’ as a concept in natural resources policy.Nat. Resour. J. 15: 713–727.
Clark, J. 1997. Coastal zone management for the new century.Ocean Coastal Manage. 37: 191–216.
Dedina, S. & Young, E. 1995.Conservation and development in the Gray Whale lagoons of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Final Report to the U.S. Marine Mammal Commission. Department of Geography and Regional Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Edwards, S.F. 1994. Ownership of renewable ocean resources.Mar. Resour. Econ. 9: 253–273.
Enríquez-Andrade, R.R. 1998.Resumen Ejecutivo del Programa de acciones y áreas prioritarias para la conservación en la Península de Baja California 1998–2007. ProNatura, Península de Baja California, Ensenada, Baja California.
Enríquez-Andrade, R.R. Danemann, G.D., Ramirez, S. & Lozano, E. 1998.Acciones prioritarias de conservación y de uso sostenible de los recursos marinos y costeras de Bahía Magdalena, B.C.S., México, ProNatura, Península de Baja California, Ensenada, Baja California. Unpublished Internal Document.
Fermán-Almada, J.L. & Gómez-Morin, L. 1993. Legal and regulatory aspects to support a Mexican coastal zone management program. In: Fermán-Almada, J.L., Gómez-Morin, L. & Fischer, D. W. (eds.)Coastal management in Mexico: The Baja California Experience, pp. 7–13. Coastlines of the World series, and Proceedings of the eighth Symposium on Coastal Ocean Management. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY.
Fermán-Almada, J.L. Fischer, D. W., & Espejel, I. 1999. Coastal use policy and its future in Baja California. In: Anon. (ed)Coastal zone proceedings 1999, pp. 506–507. Coastal Zone 99 Conference Abstracts, San Diego, CA.
Fischer, D. In press.Techniques for coastal zone policyformation. Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali.
Gilman, E. 1997. Community based and multiple purpose protected areas: A model to select and manage protected areas with lessons from the Pacific Islands.Coastal Manage. 25: 59–91.
Hardi, P. & Pinter, L. 1995.Models and methods of measuring sustainable development performance: revised draft discussion report prepared for the Sustainable Development Coordination Unit, Executive Council, Government of Manitoba, International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Winnipeg.
Krause, G. 1995. Sustainable tourism for remote atolls in the Pacific.Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2: 166–181.
Maravilla, C. 1991. La ballena gris de California (Eschrichtius robustus). In: Ortega, A. & Arriaga, L. (eds.)La reserva de la biosfera El Vizcaíno en la península de Baja California, pp. 213–230. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Baja California Sur.
Margoluis, R. & Salafsky, N. 1998.Measures of success: designing, managing, and monitoring conservation and development projects. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Merino, M. 1987. The coastal zone of Mexico.Coastal Manage, 15: 27–42.
Olsen, S. et al. 1997. A common framework for learning from ICZM experience.Ocean Coastal Manage 37: 155–174.
Rivas, V., Fischer, D. & Cendrero, A. 1994. Perception of indicators of coastal environment quality by municipal officials in northern Spain.Int. J. Environ. Stud. 45: 217–225.
Rivas, V., González, A., Fischer, D. & Cendrero, A. 1994. An approach to environmental assessment within the land-use planning process: northern Spanish experiences.J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 37: 305–322.
Robadue Jr., D. (ed.) 1995.Eight years in Ecuador: The road to integrated coastal management. Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, RI.
Sáenz, M.A. 1997.Evaluación de los escenarios para la desarrollo de las actividades económicas en las poblaciones de Puerto San Carlos y Puerto Adolfo Lopez Mateos en Bahía Magdalena Baja California Sur, México, durante la temporada de reproducción de la ballena gris. ProNatura Península de Baja California, Ensenada, BC.
Schlager, E. & Ostrum, E. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis.Land Econ. 63: 249–262.
Sorenson, J. & Brandani, A. 1987. An overview of coastal management efforts in Latin America.Coastal Manage. 15: 1–25.
Tovar-Vázquez, J.U. 1997.Diagnostico socioeconómico de las localidades de Puerto Chale, Adolfo Lopez Mateos y Puerto San Carlos, Involucradas en el manejo del recurso Ballena Gris en Bahía Magdalena. Pro Natura, Península de Baja California, Ensenada, BC.
Turner, R.K., Adger, W.N. & Lorenzi, I. 1998.Land-ocean interactions in the coastal zone (LOICZ)—Towards integrated modelling and analysis in coastal zones: Principles and practice. LOICZ Reports and Studies 11.
Zar, J. 1984.Biostatistical analysis. 2nd. ed. Prentice-Hall, Énglewood Cliffs, NJ.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hastings, R.M., Fischer, D.W. Management priorities for Magdalena Bay, Baja California, Mexico. J Coast Conserv 7, 193–202 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742481
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742481