References
Bollas, C. (1987).The Shadow of the Object: Psychoanalysis of the Unthought Known. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bromberg P. M. (1993). Shadow and substance: A relational perspective on clinical process.Psychoanalytic Psychology 10(2):147–168.
Butler, J. (1990).Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
Dimen, M. (1991). Deconstructing difference: Gender, splitting, and transitional space.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1(3):335–352.
Dimen, M. (1995). On “our nature”: Prolegomenon to a relational theory of sexuality. In T. Domenici and R. Lesser (eds.),Disorienting Sexualities. New York: Routledge.
Dimen, M. (this issue). The third step: Freud, the feminists and postmodernism.The American Journal of Psychoanalysis.
Flax, J. (1990).Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fraser, N., and Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In L. J. Nicholson (ed.),Feminism/Postmodernism.
Freud, S. (1905). Three essays on the theory of sexuality.Standard Edition 7:125–245.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. InThe Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Goldner, V. (1991). Toward a critical relational theory of gender.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1(3):249–272.
Harris, A. (1991). Gender as contradiction.Psychoanalytic Dialogues 1(2):197–224.
Horney, K. (1967).Feminine Psychology, H. R. Kelman (ed.), New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Ingram, D. H. (1994). Poststructuralist interpretation of the psychoanalytic relationship.Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis 22(2):175–193.
Jordan, J. V., Kaplan, A. G., Miller, J. B., Stiver, I. P., and Surrey, J. L. (1991).Women’s Growth in Connection: Writings from the Stone Center. New York: Guilford Press.
Kaminsky, M. (1994). Discourse and self-formation: The concept of mentsh in modern Yiddish culture.American Journal of Psychoanalysis 54(4):293–316.
Miller, J. B. (1976).Toward a New Psychology of Women. Boston: Beacon.
Mitchell, S. A. (1993).Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
Price, M. (in press). Horney’s counter-discourses: Contemporary implications. In P. Marcus and A. Rosenberg (eds.),Psychoanalytic Versions of the Human Condition and Clinical Practice. New York: New York University Press.
Rivera, M. (1989). Linking the psychological and the social: Feminism, poststructuralism and multiple personality.Dissociation 2(1):24–31.
Stoller, R. J. (1985).Presentations of Gender. New York, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, M. Gender talk: Discussion of muriel dimen’s ‘third step’. Am J Psychoanal 55, 321–330 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02741981
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02741981