Skip to main content
Log in

A longitudinal field test of stockout effects on multi-brand inventories

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stockouts do present a threat to a brand's stability in the marketplace. But is that threat as significant as one might initially be led to believe? The results of this study, as well as two prior efforts of similar methodology (Charlton and Ehrenberg 1976; Motes 1980), would suggest not, at least in the context of multi-brand inventories. It is strongly suggested that retailers, as well as manufacturers, need not be overly concerned about protracted adverse effects emanating from temporary stockouts at the retail level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang, Yu Sang 1967. “Reorder Point Models with NonDecreasing Stockout Costs.”Journal of Industrial Engineering, 18 (June) 365–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Niland, Powell 1967. “A Model for Measuring Stock Depletion Costs.”Operations Research, 15 (May–June) 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, P. and Ehrenberg, A.S.C. 1976. “An Experiment in Brand Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research, 13 (May) 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas D. and Campbell, Donald T. 1976. “Experiments in Field Settings.” In Marvin D. Dunnette, Ed.,Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, A.S.C. and Charlton P. 1973. “An Analysis of Simulated Brand Choice.”Journal of Advertising Research, 13 (February) 21–33. “How to Stamp Out Stockouts.”Progressive Grocer, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, Charles Jr., Brown, Earl H., and Earle, Wendell 1969. “Out of Stocks in Supermarkets.”Research Highlights in Food Distribution, 4 (Spring) 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, J. Douglas 1968. “The Development of Brand Loyalty: An Experimental Study.”Journal of Marketing Research, 5 (February) 13–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motes, W. H. 1980. “Field Test of Artificial and Real Brand Choice Behavior.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of South Carolina (December) 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckham, James O. 1963. “The Consumer Speaks.”Journal of Marketing, 27 (October) 21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schary, Philip B. and Becker, Boris W. 1978. “The Impact of Stock-Out on Market Share: Temporal Effects.”Journal of Business Logistics, 1 (Number 1) 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Christopher, M. 1979. “The Anatomy of a Stock Out.”Journal of Retailing, 55 (Summer) 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • “The Out-of-Stock Study.”Progressive Grocer, (September–December 1968) 1–16.

  • Tucker, W. T. 1964. “The Development of Brand Loyalty.”Journal of Marketing Research, 1 (August) 32–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, C. K. and Grabner, John R. 1975. “Stockout Cost Models: Empirical Tests in a Retail Situation.”Journal of Marketing, 39 (July) 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — and LaLonde, Bernard J. 1975. “Development and Tests of Two Stockout Cost Models.”International Journal of Physical Distribution, 5 (Number 3) 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Motes, W.H., Castleberry, S.B. A longitudinal field test of stockout effects on multi-brand inventories. JAMS 13, 54–68 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737199

Keywords

Navigation