Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic responses of male samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) to a decline in the number of receptive females

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Observations on a habituated troop of samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis)revealed that lone males did not achieve significant mating opportunities during a breeding season in which few females were sexually receptive. This stood in contrast to the previous year and was associated with the maintenance of shorter resident male-female distances, confirming suggestions that the reproductive benefits of residency are associated primarily with low numbers of simultaneously receptive females. At the same time, lone males made no attempt to challenge the resident male physically in order to gain access to females. Given the presence of a stable bachelor group and the absence of other, transient, males, these data are used to argue for male mating strategies that are sensitive to regional and temporal variability in the availability of receptive females.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andelman, S. J. (1986). Ecological and social determinants of cercopithecine mating patterns. In Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.),Ecological Aspects of Vertebrate Social Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., pp. 201–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butynski, T. M. (1982). Harem male replacement and infanticide in the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmannt) in the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Am. J. Primatol. 3: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butynski, T. M. (1988). Comparative ecology of blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) in high and low density subpopulations (in press).

  • Chism, J. B., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Mating and residence patterns of male patas monkeys.Ethology 72: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. (1984). Mating patterns and social structure in redtail monkeys (Cercopithecus ascanius).Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 313–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. (1986). Forest guenons and patas monkeys: Male-male competition in one-male groups. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.),Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. (1988). Mating systems of forest guenons: A preliminary review. In Gautier-Hion, A., Bourliere, F., Gautier, J.-P., and Kingdon, J. (eds.),A Primate Radiation: Evolutionary Biology of the African Guenons, Cambrdige University Press, Cambridge pp. 323–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Group fission in blue monkeys of the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Folia Primatol. 46: 70–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M., and Rowell, T. E. (1987). Birth intervals of cercopithecus monkeys of the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Primates 28: 277–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M., Mitchell, B. J., Tsingalia, H. M., and Rowell, T. E. (1986). Promiscuous mating among blue monkeys in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya.Etology 72: 214–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1982). Intraspecific variations in mating strategy. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Klopfer, P. H. (eds.), Perspectives in Ethology, Plenum Press, New York, Vol. 5, pp. 385–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988).Primate Social Systems, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, J. G., Eley, R. M., Suleman, M. A., and Lequin, R. M. (1985). Reproductive biology of Sykes and blue monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis).Am. J. primatol. 9: 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197: 215–223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, K. R. L. (1965). Behaviour and ecology of the wild patas monkey,Erylhrocebus paras, in Uganda.J. Zool. (London) 148: 15–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, R. S. O., and Olson, D. K. (1986). Patterns of mating among male patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). In Kenya.Am. J. Primatol. 11: 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henzi, S. P., and Lawes, M. (1987). Breeding season influxes and the behaviour of adult male samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis albogularis).Folia primatol. 48: 125–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, J. T. (1984). Mating in bighorn sheep: multiple creative male strategies.Science 225: 526–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, J. W., and Vonder Haar Laws, J. (1984). Social-interactions’among male langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Rajaji Wildlife Sanctuary.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (1985).Demography and Sociality in Primates, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajpurohit, L. S., and Mohnot, S. M. (1988). Fate of ousted male residents of one-male bisexual troops of hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur, Rajasthan (India).Hum. Evol. (in press).

  • Rowell, T. E. (1988). Beyond the one-male group.Behaviour 104: 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, D. I. (1980). On the evolution of alternative mating strategies. In Staddon, J. E. R. (ed.),Limits to Action, Academic Press, London, pp. 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudran, R. (1978). Socioecology of the blue monkey (Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni) of the Kibale Forest, Uganda.Smithsonian Contrib. Zool. 249.

  • Smuts, B. B. (1985).Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V. (1988). Male competition and coalition in langurs (Presbytis entellus) at Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.Hum. Evol. (in press).

  • Struhsaker, T. T. (1969). Correlates of ecology and social organization among African cercopithecines.Folia primatol. 11: 80–118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struhsaker, T. T., and Leland, L. (1979). Socioecology of five sympatric monkey species in the Kibale Forest, Uganda. In Rosenblatt, J. S., Hinde, R. A., Beer, C., and Busnel, M.-C. (Eds.),Advances in the Study of Behavior, Academic Press, New York, Vol. 9, pp. 159–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, S. C. (1982). Agonistic dominance in male baboons: An alternative view.Int. J. Primatol. 3: 175–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsingalia, H. M., and Rowell, T. E. (1984). The behavior of adult male blue monkeys.Z. Tierpsychol. 64: 253–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberger, J. F. (1980). Group size and polygamy in social mammals.Am. Nat. 115: 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups.Behaviour 75: 262–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henzi, S.P., Lawes, M. Strategic responses of male samango monkeys (Cercopithecus mitis) to a decline in the number of receptive females. Int J Primatol 9, 479–495 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736221

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02736221

Key words

Navigation