Summary
We discuss various possible reasons for the violation of Adler’s neutrino sum rule with particular emphasis on the possible breaking of scaling.
Riassunto
Si discutono i vari possibili motivi della violazione della regola di somma di Adler per i neutrini. Si pone particolare enfasi sulla possibile rottura dell’invarianza di scala.
Реэюме
Мы обсуждаем раэличные воэможные причины нарущения правила сумм Адлера для нейтрино. Особое внимание уделяется воэможному нарущению скейлинга.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. L. Adler:Phys. Rev.,143, 1144 (1966).
R. P. Feynman:Photon-Hadron Interactions (New York, N. Y., 1972).
By making few assumptionsTuan and others (S. Tuan:Phys. Rev. D,7, 2092 (1973);O. Nachtman:Phys. Rev. D,7, 3340 (1973)) have concluded that the sum rule can be satisfied only with a large, although not ruled out by experiments as yet, ratio of neutrino and proton structure functions.
S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev.,122, 1375 (1958).
K. Sugimoto, I. Tanihata andJ. Göring:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 1533. (1975)
A. Khare andK. Kawarabayashi:Prog. Theor. Phys.,52, 262 (1974).
We note, however, that naive scale dimensions larger than 3 are not sufficient to have a violation of the sum rule. See ref. (10).
H. Stremnitzer:Phys. Rev. D,10, 1327 (1970).
C. F. A. Pantin:Nucl. Phys.,25 B, 245 (1970).
T. Das, P. P. Divakaran, L. K. Pandit andVirendra Singh:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 770 (1975);Pra \(\bar m\)ana,4, 105 (1975);R. Rodenberg: preprint Technische Hochschule Aachen, June 1975.
A. Khare:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 770 (1975);Prog. Theor. Phys.,53, 1798 (1975);T. Das, P. P. Divakaran, L. K. Pandit andVirendra Singh:Phys. Rev. Lett.,34, 770 (1975).
In Pantin’s paper (ref. (10)) « induced like terms » are explicitely considered whose presence does not modify i), so that the presence of nonminimal terms of « structure quarks » also do not necessarily imply aq 2-dependence in A.s.r.
F. Cannata andP. Mazzanti: unpublished.
F. Cannata andR. Leonardi:Phys. Rev. C,5, 1189 (1975).
M. Han andY. Nambu:Phys. Rev.,139, B 1006 (1965).
M. Gell-Mann: CERN TH-1543;W. A. Bardeen, H. Fritzsch andM. Gell-Mann: CERN TH-1538.
N. Cabibbo, L. Maiani andG. Preparata:Phys. Lett.,25 B, 132 (1967).
S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 1264 (1967);Y. Achiman:Nucl. Phys.,56 B, 635 (1973);M. A. Beg andA. Zee:Phys. Rev. Lett.,30, 675 (1973);Phys. Rev. D,8, 2334 (1973).
A. Salam andJ. C. Ward:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 168 (1964);S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 1264 (1967);A. Salam:Elementary particle theory, inRelativistic Group and Analiticity (Nobel Symposium, No. 18), edited byN. Svartholm (New York, N. Y., 1969).
S. L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos andL. Maiani:Phys. Rev. D,2, 1285 (1970);Z. Maki andT. Maskawa:Prog. Theor. Phys.,46, 1647 (1971).
M. Katuya, Y. Baba andK. Fujii: preprint EPHOU 75-01.
See, for a discussion of theJ=1 fixed role effect,S. B. Treiman: BNL Report No. 15732 (1970);H. Harari:Phys. Rev. Lett.,22, 1078 (1969);J. D. Bjorken andS. F. Tuan:Comm. Nucl. Part. Phys.,5, 71 (1972).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
To speed up publication, the authors of this paper have agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cannata, F., Khare, A. & Mazzanti, P. Some comments on the violation of Adler’s neutrino sum rule. Nuov Cim A 33, 227–232 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734402
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734402