Skip to main content
Log in

CP, I=1/2 rule and K decay

CP, правилоI=1/2 и распады K.

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento A (1965-1970)

Summary

We derive the slopes for the distribution of unlike and like pion energy spectra from squared matrix element. The application of the newest data to the relevant formula enables us to conclude thatCP is conserved in both theI=1 andI=2 states; therefore data of K are consistent with the data of |η 00| ≃ |η +−|, soCP violation comes only from the composition of K 02 and K 01 . We also present the prediction ofγ (+−0) S γ (+−0) L ≃ 10−6 if theI=2 state is zero and ≃ 10−3 if theI=2 state exists.

Riassunto

Dal quadrato degli elementi di matrice si deducono le pendenze della distribuzione degli spettri di energia dei pioni simili e dissimili. L’applicazione dei dati più recenti alla formula adatta ci permette di concludere cheCP è conservata sia nello statoI=1 che in quelloI=2; quindi i dati di K sono in accordo con i dati di |γ 00| ≃ |γ +−|, cosicché la violazione diCP proviene solo dalla composizione di K 02 e K 12 . Si presenta anche la predizione cheγ (+−0) S γ (+−0) L ≃ 10−6 se lo statoI=2 è nullo e ≃ 10−3 se lo statoI=2 esiste.

Реэюме

Мы выводим наклоны для распределения знергетических спектров неодинаковых и одинаковых пионов, исходя иэ квадрата матричного злемента. Применение новейщих данных в соответствуюших формулах поэволяет нам сделать вывод, что СР сохраняется в обоих состоянияхI=1 иI=2. Следовательно, данные относительно K согласуются с данными для |γ00| ≃ |ν+−|, а нарущениеCP проистекает только эа счет сложения K 02 и K 01 . Мы также предскаэываемγ (+−0) s γ (+−0) L ≃ 10−6, если состояниеI=2 есть нуль и зто отнощение равно ≃ 10−3, если состояниеI=2 сушествует.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. W. K. Hopkins, T. C. Bacon andV. R. Eisler:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 185 (1967);P. Basile, J. Cronin, B. Thevenet, R. Turley, S. Zylberajch andA. Zylberstejn:Phys. Lett.,28 B, 58 (1968);W. A. Blanpied, L. Levit, E. Engles, M. Coltein, T. Kirk, D. Ryan andD. Stairs:Phys. Rev. Lett.,21, 1650 (1968).

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. I A Budagov, D. C. Cundy, G. Myatt, F. A. Nezrick, G. H. Trilling, W. Venus, H. Yoshiki, B. Aubert, P. Heusse, J. Le Dong, J. P. Lowys, D. Morellet, E. Nagy, C. Pascaud, L. Behr, P. Beillière, G. Boutang, M. Schiff andJ. Van der Velde:Phys. Lett.,28 B, 215 (1968);M. Banner, J. W. Cronin, J. K. Liu andJ. E. Pilcher:Phys. Rev. Lett.,21, 1103, 1107 (1968);D. F. Bartlett, R. K. Carnegie, V. L. Fitch, K. Goulianos, D. P. Hutchinson, T. Kamae, R. F. Roth, J. S. Russ andW. Vernon:Phys. Rev. Lett.,21, 558 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. T. Wu andC. N. Yang:Phys. Rev. Lett.,13, 380 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Barton, C. Kacser andS. P. Rosen:Phys. Rev.,130, 783 (1963);B. Barrett andT. N. Truong:Phys. Rev. Lett.,17, 880 (1966);T. J. Devlin andS. Barshay:Phys. Rev. Lett.,19, 881 (1967);B. Kenny:Ann. of Phys.,43, 25 (1967);M. K. Gaillard:Nuovo Cimento,35, 1335 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. W. Lee:Suppl. to New Phys. (Seoul),7, 41 (1968). In the nonrelativistic limit, Lee co-ordinates differ from Dalitz co-ordinates by only 10%.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See (4); above,Truong et al.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,4, 87 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Whereβ=4/3 (M K /μ)2 a, of eq. (11) to (13).

  9. G. H. Trilling:International Conference on Weak Interactions, Argonne A.N.L. Report 7130, 115 (1965);B. M. K. Nefkens, A. Abashian, R. J. Abrams, D. W. Carpenter, G. P. Fisher andJ. H. Smith:Phys. Rev.,157, 1233 (1967).

  10. Note added after this paper was completed. The latest report, byJ. Grauman, S. Taylor, E. L. Koller, D. Pandoulas, S. Hoffmaster, O. Raths, L. Romano, P. Stamer, A. Kanofsky andV. Mainkar:Phys. Rev. Lett.,23, 737 (1969), gavea(τ′ +)/a(τ +)=−2.63 ± 0.18; this is consistent with this analysis that theI=2 state has a small contribution. It is clear from eq. (33), thata(τ′ +)/a(gt +)=−2 + (−2)/λc(1/a(τ +)) · · cos (δ λ +ϕ λc ) and = −2.63 ± 0.18, and thereforec/γ ≠ 0.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. See also (7) above.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research Sponsored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Office of Aerospace Research, United States Air Force, Under Contract/Grant Number 69-1675.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen-Cheung, FS. CP, I=1/2 rule and K decay. Nuov Cim A 1, 706–716 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734393

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734393

Navigation