Differential outcomes training facilitates memory in people with Korsakoff and Prader-Willi syndromes
- 111 Downloads
This article presents evidence that a teaching procedure called differential outcomes training enhances learning and memory. Differential outcomes training reinforces correct responses with outcomes that are unique and specific to the stimuli that are to be remembered. Teaching with this method enhances performance in people with Korsakoff syndrome and people with Prader-Willi syndrome, populations known to have lerning and working memory deficits. This initial evidence that persons with learning and memory deficits benefit from differential outcomes training should encourage future work on the development of an intervention using this type of training to aide daily functioning by people with learning and memory impairments.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- Goeters, S., Blakely, E., & Poling, A. (1992). The differential outcomes effect.Psychological Record, 42, 389–411.Google Scholar
- Langlais, P.J. (1995). Alcohol-related thiamine deficiency: Impact on cognitive and memory functioning.Alcohol World, 19 (2), 113–121.Google Scholar
- Malanga, P., & Poling, A. (1992). Letter recognition by adults with mental handicaps: Improving performance through differential outcomes.Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 20(2), 39–48.Google Scholar
- Oscar-Berman, M., & Bonner, R.T. (1989). Nonmatching-(oddity) and delayed nonmatching-to-sample performance in aging, alcoholic, and alcoholic Korsakoff individuals.Psychobiology, 17, 424–430.Google Scholar
- Savage, L.M., & Langlais, P.J. (1995). Differential outcomes attenuates spatial memory impairments seen in pyrithiamine-induced thiamine deficient rats.Psychobiology, 23, 153–160.Google Scholar
- Savage, L.M., & Parsons, J. (1997). The effects of delay interval, intertrial interval, amnestic drugs, and differential outcomes on matching-to-position in rats.Psychobiology, 25(4), 303–312.Google Scholar
- Savage, L.M., Pitkin, S., & Knitowski, K. (1999). Rats exposed to pyrithiamine—induced thiamine deficiency are more sensitive to the amnestic effects of scopolamine and MK-801: Examination of working memory, response selection, and reinforcement contingencies.Behavioural Brain Research, 104, 13–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trapold, M.A., & Overmier, J.B. (1972). The second learning process in instrumental learning. In A.H. Black & W.F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical Conditioning II: Current Theory and Research (pp. 427–452). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
- Vietor, M., Adams, R.D., & Collins, G.H..The Wernicke-Korsakoff Syndrome and Related Neurologic Disorders to Alcoholism and Malnutrition. 1989. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.Google Scholar
- Warren, J.L., & Hunt, E. (1981). Cognitive processing in children with Prader-Willi syndrome. In V.A. Holm, S. Sulzbacher & P. Pipes (Eds.),The Prader-Willi syndrome (pp. 161–178). Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar