Summary
Loading trailers and trucks includes a high risk for mechanical damage to potatoes, particularly when no anti-shock system is used. Manufacturers offer anti-shock equipment to reduce mechanical damage. A selection of anti-shock systems was compared.
Firstly, the effect of protecting the product layer at the bottom of the trailer was investigated by dropping tubers in the empty trailer and analysing tissue discolouration and cracks. The combination of a shock absorber and a mattress yielded the highest bruise protection. Secondly, to investigate the bruising profile in the trailer and the damage reduction effect of each anti-shock system a bulk mass of potatoes was dumped into the trailer. Five hundred test potatoes were mixed into the bulk mass. Test potatoes were visually analysed for bruising and compared with controls (anti-shock systems absent). The results allowed the introduction of a mathematical relationship between drop height and tissue discolouration. Using an anti-shock system bruising was reduced by 10–90%, depending on the system and the bulk layer.
On-field experiments were carried out to validate laboratory results. However site-specific harvest conditions and variable commodity properties made comparisons difficult.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ampe, G., 1991. Aardappelonderzoek: methoden bij veldproeven. [Potato Research: methods for field experiments]. Rapport Werkgroep Akkerbouw, Roeselare, Belgium, 8 pp.
Baheri, M., 1997. Development of a method for prediction of potato mechanical damage in the chain of mechanized potato production. PhD thesis, University of Leuven, Belgium, 301 pp.
Bouman, A., 1995. Mechanical damage in potato tubers. Inquiry of the EAPR Engineering Section. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Wageningen, 38 pp.
Jandel Scientific Software, 1997. User’s manual, Sigmaplot 4.0.
Kunkel, R. & R.E. Thornton, 1986. Understanding the potato. Scientific Paper No. 7267, College of Agriculture and Home Economics, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164–6414.
Leicher, J., 1992. Mechanical damage to potatoes: a shared responsibility. Report N.D.A.L.T.P., Belgium, 7 pp.
Lüdemann, K., R. Peters & B. Lehmann, 2002. Transport und Einlagerungsverfahren für Speisekartoffeln. [Transport and storage methods for fresh potatoes]. Kartoffelbau 53(7): 252–259.
Molema, G.-J, 1999. Mechanical force and subcutaneous tissue discolouration in potato. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 93 pp.
Nerinckx, G. & R. Verschoore, 1993. Use of the electronic potato as an indicator for the occurrence of mechanical damage to potatoes. Thesis, University of Ghent, Belgium, 133 pp.
PAGV, 1989. Handboek voor de akkerbouw en de groenteteelt in de vollegrond. [Handbook on arable farming and field vegetable crops]. PAGV Lelystad, The Netherlands, 251 pp.
SPSS Inc., 2000. User’s manual, SPSS 10.0.
Van Canneyt, T., E. Tijskens, H. Ramon, R. Verschoore & B. Sonck, 2004. Development of a predictive tissue discolouration model based on the electronic potato impacts. Biosystems Engineering 88(1): 81–93.
Veerman, A., P.C. Struik & P.C.J.M. Timmermans, 1996. Variation in tuber dry matter and nitrate content between and within plants and stems. Abstracts of Conference Papers, Posters and Demonstrations of the 13th Triennial Conference of the EAPR. European Association for Potato Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 656–657.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Canneyt, T., Spriet, Y., Verschoore, R. et al. Quality assessment of antishock systems for potatoes. Potato Res. 48, 35–48 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733680
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733680