References
R. P. Ely, M. Baldo-Ceolin, E. Calimani, S. Ciampolillo, O. Fabbri, F. Farini, C. Filippi, H. Huzita, G. Miari, U. Camerini, W. F. Fry andS. Natali:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 132 (1962).
B. P. Roe, D. Sinclair, J. L. Brown, D. A. Glaser, J. A. Kadyk andG. H. Trilling:Phys. Rev. Lett.,7, 346 (1961).
J. M. Dobbs, K. Lande, A. K. Mann, K. Reibel, F. J. Sciulli, H. Uto, D. H. White andK. K. Young:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 295 (1962).
H. Chew:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 297 (1962).
M. Gell-Mann:Proc. of the Rochester Conference on High-Energy Physics (1960), p. 508;J. Bernstein andS. Weinberg:Phys. Rev. Lett.,5, 481 (1960).
Cf.S. MacDowell:Phys. Rev.,116, 1047 (1939).
Such a parameter may be taken to be the ratio [see eq. (2)], provided that bothf − andf + are slow-varying functions ofs. A detailed discussion of the case of constant form factors has been given byN. Brene, L. Egardt andB. Qvist:Nucl. Phys.,22, 33 (1961), These authors however did not consider the Δl=3/2 amplitudes.
M. Alston, L. W. Alvarez, P. Eberhard, M. L. Good, W. Graziano, H. K. Ticho andS. Wojcicki:Phys. Rev. Lett.,6, 300 (1961).
A more recent experiment [G. Alexander et al.:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 447 (1962)].
The relative rateR 02 /R + is a rapidly-varying function ofα for values ofα in the neighborhood of 1/√2. Forα≈1 the ratioR 02 /R is about 3, which is not ruled out by present experiments (G. Alexander, post-deadline paper delivered at the American Physical Society meeting at Washington, D. C., April 26, 1962).
J. L. Brown, J. A. Kadik, G. H. Trilling, R. T. Van de Walle, B. P. Roe andD. Sinclair:Phys. Rev. Lett.,8, 450 (1962).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Atomic Energy Commission.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chew, H. Magnitude of the ΔI=3/2 amplitude in K +13 decay. Nuovo Cim 25, 952–955 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733163
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02733163